ScratchingHead
10-01 01:18 PM
I am sorry you made BA as a choice. Kindly do not support any airlines/countries that require visas for Indian citizens in transit.
You get a green buddy!!!!
You get a green buddy!!!!
wallpaper i love you mommy poems.
ragz4u
02-27 10:29 AM
A bit melodramatic, but i can relate to that. I lost one of my parents to this "US dream". But that is my personal problem.
I know of a colleague who lost her father but could not go to perform the last rites because she did not have the H1 stamped and the earliest appointment that any consulate in India was giving her was 4 months away.
I know of a colleague who lost her father but could not go to perform the last rites because she did not have the H1 stamped and the earliest appointment that any consulate in India was giving her was 4 months away.
n.sravan
10-03 12:26 PM
I have two passports one with H4 Visa stamped and another Surname changed. While entering US, I have used my name as in the Visa (new surname) in the I-94 card.
I have applied for H1B with new surname in this May and change of Status with that I-94.
During H1 processing, I have travelled out of US and while entering back I have used old surname( as sometime back DMV ppl told that the name on I-94 should match with H4 Visa)
Now I got H1 approval and COS approval with my middle name taken as first name and new surname.
1) First thing is, the I-94 on COS approval and I-94, currently present in my Passport does not match.
2) First name and middle name are interchanged in the passport and H1 approval.
Is this going to create any problem while applying SSN? What are the possible consequences..
Also, any similar scenarios, plz respond..
I have applied for H1B with new surname in this May and change of Status with that I-94.
During H1 processing, I have travelled out of US and while entering back I have used old surname( as sometime back DMV ppl told that the name on I-94 should match with H4 Visa)
Now I got H1 approval and COS approval with my middle name taken as first name and new surname.
1) First thing is, the I-94 on COS approval and I-94, currently present in my Passport does not match.
2) First name and middle name are interchanged in the passport and H1 approval.
Is this going to create any problem while applying SSN? What are the possible consequences..
Also, any similar scenarios, plz respond..
2011 love you poems quotes. i
jliechty
June 14th, 2004, 12:33 AM
Not to throw more rocks into the gears here.. But unless the S2 has been updated (which I don't follow really), it was using the chip that was in the Nikon D1 I believe?
If that is such the case, ISO800 is noisy and you can't really shoot above that.
Disregard this if it is newer tech and I'm completely off base.
-- Matt
I don't recall reading anything about Nikon D1 tech being in the Fuji S2... noise seems related to the image capturing sensor and the electronics that follow. The S2 uses Fuji's SuperCCD (which stacks the pixels in a different pattern that allows for slightly better resolution in the "12" MP mode - which certainly doesn't come near the 1Ds, but some say it is better than the 6MP DSLRs, and no, I've not seen a S2 vs. 1DMKII comparison yet). What instead might actually "throw more rocks in gears" is that Thom mentions at the bottom of his review that he's heard more complaints about S2 reliability than other Nikon-based DSLRs, which is worse when one considers the fact that there aren't as many S2s out there as other Nikon DSLRs. It's a good camera image-quality wise, but it's expensive compared to other 6MP DSLRs, and there are questions about reliability. You pays your money and you takes your choice :)
If that is such the case, ISO800 is noisy and you can't really shoot above that.
Disregard this if it is newer tech and I'm completely off base.
-- Matt
I don't recall reading anything about Nikon D1 tech being in the Fuji S2... noise seems related to the image capturing sensor and the electronics that follow. The S2 uses Fuji's SuperCCD (which stacks the pixels in a different pattern that allows for slightly better resolution in the "12" MP mode - which certainly doesn't come near the 1Ds, but some say it is better than the 6MP DSLRs, and no, I've not seen a S2 vs. 1DMKII comparison yet). What instead might actually "throw more rocks in gears" is that Thom mentions at the bottom of his review that he's heard more complaints about S2 reliability than other Nikon-based DSLRs, which is worse when one considers the fact that there aren't as many S2s out there as other Nikon DSLRs. It's a good camera image-quality wise, but it's expensive compared to other 6MP DSLRs, and there are questions about reliability. You pays your money and you takes your choice :)
more...
kumar1
07-11 02:37 PM
They will not get I-94 for more than 6 months. You need to do following things to claim them as dependet(s) -
1. Extend their stay beyond I-94 i.e. 6 months.
2. Get ITIN number for them. (I am not sure how you get it on B1/B2)
This is the primary reason, immigration does not give more than 6 months I-94 on B1/B2 and avoid extending their stay....even if those are genuine reason(s).
1. Extend their stay beyond I-94 i.e. 6 months.
2. Get ITIN number for them. (I am not sure how you get it on B1/B2)
This is the primary reason, immigration does not give more than 6 months I-94 on B1/B2 and avoid extending their stay....even if those are genuine reason(s).
JunRN
07-17 06:58 AM
I'm sorry...never done Medical yet...what is a PCP? Pardon for the ignorance....
more...
mdborland
September 19th, 2004, 09:18 PM
> Has anyone out there had experience with the backfocusing problem to which I refer?
Yes, I've had this problem and I'm nearly at the end of my rope with Nikon. I've been a Nikon user for over a decade now. I own three Nikon bodies, 7 Nikkor lenses (mostly AFD primes), and two Nikon speedlights. I do mostly existing-light photojournalism as well as macro photography and landscapes.
Originally, my D70 had horrible backfocus with anything wider than a 70mm lens. The left AF sensor in particular was completely useless. After the first repair, the camera was much improved. I bought a $1000 12-24mm Nikkor, only to find the camera didn't focus properly with the lens. I sent both lens and camera in. I got the camera back a few days ago and it is worse than when I sent it in. I don't think Nikon Service has any quality control. The problem was obvious from the first few shots I took. The left AF sensor is again useless and the center sensor is marginal. At f2.8, it is obvious that the depth of field is all behind the subject.
I have an old N90s that takes painfully sharp pictures with the same lenses that I put on the D70. I'm going to give Nikon one more chance. If they don't fix it, I'm going to sell all my Nikon gear and never buy another thing from Nikon as long as I live. After years of shooting Velvia, I've found I really like digital photography and I'm not going to stick with Nikon if they can't provide quality products or at least proper repair.
Yes, I've had this problem and I'm nearly at the end of my rope with Nikon. I've been a Nikon user for over a decade now. I own three Nikon bodies, 7 Nikkor lenses (mostly AFD primes), and two Nikon speedlights. I do mostly existing-light photojournalism as well as macro photography and landscapes.
Originally, my D70 had horrible backfocus with anything wider than a 70mm lens. The left AF sensor in particular was completely useless. After the first repair, the camera was much improved. I bought a $1000 12-24mm Nikkor, only to find the camera didn't focus properly with the lens. I sent both lens and camera in. I got the camera back a few days ago and it is worse than when I sent it in. I don't think Nikon Service has any quality control. The problem was obvious from the first few shots I took. The left AF sensor is again useless and the center sensor is marginal. At f2.8, it is obvious that the depth of field is all behind the subject.
I have an old N90s that takes painfully sharp pictures with the same lenses that I put on the D70. I'm going to give Nikon one more chance. If they don't fix it, I'm going to sell all my Nikon gear and never buy another thing from Nikon as long as I live. After years of shooting Velvia, I've found I really like digital photography and I'm not going to stick with Nikon if they can't provide quality products or at least proper repair.
2010 i love you poems. love you
ras
05-22 06:09 PM
I just talked to an attorney. He said that if there is a long gap, your H1 may be approved but with out extension of stay (no I-94) and that I may have to go for visa stampling in the consulate in India. As I already have 1.5 years on h1, I was told that it doesn't go thru the cap. some one mentioned in the thread, that once you use EAD, and if u were to get H1 it would be under cap. I am not sure which one is correct.
more...
rjgleason
June 10th, 2004, 05:28 AM
Thanks all
I think i'll get the Nikon D70
Only my opinion, Janey, but since you are moving up I wud be looking to the future. Meaning, the D70 will be a great camera for you and then you'll be eventually experimenting and wanting different/better lenses.
Canon offers IMHO far more superior lenses and more choices.
The 300D or the 10D both Canon, would be my choice.
I think i'll get the Nikon D70
Only my opinion, Janey, but since you are moving up I wud be looking to the future. Meaning, the D70 will be a great camera for you and then you'll be eventually experimenting and wanting different/better lenses.
Canon offers IMHO far more superior lenses and more choices.
The 300D or the 10D both Canon, would be my choice.
hair i miss you love poems.
whitecollarslave
04-04 03:27 PM
IV has been doing a great job, we should all be proud of being a part of it.
I came across this post (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10316).
I think we should keep fighting till our goal is met. Can IV core team shed some light whether recapturing the unused visa numbers is ever possible ? Even if there is slightest change, we should NOT GIVE UP and work towards it. I've read that USCIS have so far wasted upto 600,000 EB visa numbers.
Now we are seeing some light at the end of the tunnel for multi year EAD or EAD validity during the period of AOS(I-485). Should we roll up our sleeves and work for the recapture of unused visa numbers ? How to make this happen, Please share your thoughts and ideas.
LETS NOT STOP UNTIL WE GET WHAT WE DESERVE!
Agree. Recapturing unused visas (estimated to be around 218,000) is the single most important thing we should focus on. We should also keep pressure on USCIS through lobbying efforts to use up the available numbers for the current year. According to one estimate (posted somewhere on IV forums), USCIS will only use 80K visas this year.
So, what can we do?
Can we organize another rally?
Fast for a day in protest?
I came across this post (http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=10316).
I think we should keep fighting till our goal is met. Can IV core team shed some light whether recapturing the unused visa numbers is ever possible ? Even if there is slightest change, we should NOT GIVE UP and work towards it. I've read that USCIS have so far wasted upto 600,000 EB visa numbers.
Now we are seeing some light at the end of the tunnel for multi year EAD or EAD validity during the period of AOS(I-485). Should we roll up our sleeves and work for the recapture of unused visa numbers ? How to make this happen, Please share your thoughts and ideas.
LETS NOT STOP UNTIL WE GET WHAT WE DESERVE!
Agree. Recapturing unused visas (estimated to be around 218,000) is the single most important thing we should focus on. We should also keep pressure on USCIS through lobbying efforts to use up the available numbers for the current year. According to one estimate (posted somewhere on IV forums), USCIS will only use 80K visas this year.
So, what can we do?
Can we organize another rally?
Fast for a day in protest?
more...
NolaIndian32
02-11 09:36 AM
I support chanduv23! He is like our cheer leader, and we need one (or several) for IV and for this current campaign.
Thanks to the all the on-going reminders, encouragement and requests, I have collected 52 letters thus far with more than 50 in the works. I will report a final tally shortly.
Thanks to the all the on-going reminders, encouragement and requests, I have collected 52 letters thus far with more than 50 in the works. I will report a final tally shortly.
hot love you poems for him. i love
GreenCard4US
07-01 11:36 AM
Been with Ron Gotcher for over 5 years now. Never ever had a problem. The best thing is you can talk to him or his son anytime regarding any immigration issues. I had lots of H1 issues with my current employer and he was gracious enough to talk to my employer several times and help them out without charging me a penny. I would highly recommend him.
more...
house short i love you poems. i love
apahilaj
08-22 08:41 AM
It seems like except for one or two people here, individuals who have applied directly at TSC on 2nd July are getting their checks cashed/receipts this week.
It would be helpful to know if they are done with the transfer of 2nd July cases from NSC to TSC; if so, when and based on that, we can make some educated estimates.
It would be helpful to know if they are done with the transfer of 2nd July cases from NSC to TSC; if so, when and based on that, we can make some educated estimates.
tattoo i love you poems for boyfriend
.jpg "pictures why i love you poems")
satishku_2000
09-17 02:46 PM
Hi everyone, I have been approved on 9/6/7.
only 92 days after AOS filing.
My sponsor, I did work with them from 2002-2007. They agree to file i-485 in the hopes economy would get better. However house builders are doing very bad now and they cannot take me back after approval.
The question is, does this spoiled my chances for citizenship?
I think you can get a letter from employer stating that they can not employ you any more. I am not sure if they issue a letter to every person that loses the job. Just make sure that your intention to work with the sponsering employer is documented somehow .
I have an idea here ... just write an email to your boss or HR stating "how good company has been to you and how they helped you with your immigration process and given a choice you would rather work with the same company"
Take a printout of all these emails and save them if you still have a chance. You can use all these to prove if you run into any problems during the naturalization process.
Apart from these things collect the news paper clips or company wide emails that talk about downsizing. These things should help you to prove your intentions if there is a query about your intentions at the time of naturalization.
If you think company will survive for 5 or 10 more years , just keep in touch with your HR
only 92 days after AOS filing.
My sponsor, I did work with them from 2002-2007. They agree to file i-485 in the hopes economy would get better. However house builders are doing very bad now and they cannot take me back after approval.
The question is, does this spoiled my chances for citizenship?
I think you can get a letter from employer stating that they can not employ you any more. I am not sure if they issue a letter to every person that loses the job. Just make sure that your intention to work with the sponsering employer is documented somehow .
I have an idea here ... just write an email to your boss or HR stating "how good company has been to you and how they helped you with your immigration process and given a choice you would rather work with the same company"
Take a printout of all these emails and save them if you still have a chance. You can use all these to prove if you run into any problems during the naturalization process.
Apart from these things collect the news paper clips or company wide emails that talk about downsizing. These things should help you to prove your intentions if there is a query about your intentions at the time of naturalization.
If you think company will survive for 5 or 10 more years , just keep in touch with your HR
more...
pictures why i love you poems for him.
DDLMODES
07-03 07:11 PM
Check this article at:
http://www.wesh.com/money/13616272/detail.html
At the bottom they made the following completely ignorant statement:
"The State Department said the employment visa numbers are no longer available because resources are being used to reduce the backlog of passport applications."
So much for media taking this seriously...
http://www.wesh.com/money/13616272/detail.html
At the bottom they made the following completely ignorant statement:
"The State Department said the employment visa numbers are no longer available because resources are being used to reduce the backlog of passport applications."
So much for media taking this seriously...
dresses i love you poems for her. love
cyclone_p
06-25 01:32 PM
Folks :
Thanks for all the replies that you guys have been posting to this thread. On one hand I am happy that I am not alone facing this issue at the same time I am sad that we all are having to deal with this issue.
Anyways, what I have learned so far based on my research is that the reason USCIS was rejecting my application was because they wanted to figure out if I qualify for the fee waiver based on the July 30, 2007 rule. The I-485 receipt notice apparently depicts the fee paid to USCIS and hence is an easy way for someone to tell if they qualify for that.
Apparently, the personnel screening the applications at the USCIS Phoenix Lock Box have been told to use the I-485 receipt notice to figure out if the correct fee has been provided with the application. So if the I-485 receipt notice is missing (as it is for some of us), they don't know how to determine if the correct fee has been provided or not. Apparently, they can't go into the system and pull our I-485 records to check (or perhaps they don't want to). That's the reason they reject the application with those two seemingly unrelated reasons.
I have eFiled this time and hence I have bypassed that screening in some ways. My application should not be rejected due to this anymore (theoritically). I called USCIS up again later to request a duplicate I-485 receipt notice and they told me that I should not be needing it anymore as my I-765 (eFiled) has been accepted. So we'll wait and see.
I am now planning to request expedited processing of my application. For an expedited processing to be approved, it needs to satisfy atleast one of the following criteria according to USCIS...
1) Severe financial loss to company or individual
2) Extreme emergent situation
3) Humanitarian situation
4) Nonprofit status of requesting organization in furtherance of the cultural and social interests of the United States
5) Department of Defense or National Interest Situation (Note: Request must come from official United States Government entity and state that delay will be detrimental to our Government)
6) USCIS error
7) Compelling interest of USCIS
I feel I am fall under the point 1) and point 6). The IO that I talked to over the phone told me to write to USCIS with appropriate documentation.
At this time, I would like to learn from you guys if anyone of you have applied for expedited processing, what criteria did you apply under and what was your experience with it.
Further, I would appreciate if you guys comment on the reason that I plan to apply under...Do guys think it will work?
Thanks!
Thanks for all the replies that you guys have been posting to this thread. On one hand I am happy that I am not alone facing this issue at the same time I am sad that we all are having to deal with this issue.
Anyways, what I have learned so far based on my research is that the reason USCIS was rejecting my application was because they wanted to figure out if I qualify for the fee waiver based on the July 30, 2007 rule. The I-485 receipt notice apparently depicts the fee paid to USCIS and hence is an easy way for someone to tell if they qualify for that.
Apparently, the personnel screening the applications at the USCIS Phoenix Lock Box have been told to use the I-485 receipt notice to figure out if the correct fee has been provided with the application. So if the I-485 receipt notice is missing (as it is for some of us), they don't know how to determine if the correct fee has been provided or not. Apparently, they can't go into the system and pull our I-485 records to check (or perhaps they don't want to). That's the reason they reject the application with those two seemingly unrelated reasons.
I have eFiled this time and hence I have bypassed that screening in some ways. My application should not be rejected due to this anymore (theoritically). I called USCIS up again later to request a duplicate I-485 receipt notice and they told me that I should not be needing it anymore as my I-765 (eFiled) has been accepted. So we'll wait and see.
I am now planning to request expedited processing of my application. For an expedited processing to be approved, it needs to satisfy atleast one of the following criteria according to USCIS...
1) Severe financial loss to company or individual
2) Extreme emergent situation
3) Humanitarian situation
4) Nonprofit status of requesting organization in furtherance of the cultural and social interests of the United States
5) Department of Defense or National Interest Situation (Note: Request must come from official United States Government entity and state that delay will be detrimental to our Government)
6) USCIS error
7) Compelling interest of USCIS
I feel I am fall under the point 1) and point 6). The IO that I talked to over the phone told me to write to USCIS with appropriate documentation.
At this time, I would like to learn from you guys if anyone of you have applied for expedited processing, what criteria did you apply under and what was your experience with it.
Further, I would appreciate if you guys comment on the reason that I plan to apply under...Do guys think it will work?
Thanks!
more...
makeup makeup i love you poems in
rsdang
07-01 11:49 AM
Thanks for taking the time to respond.
girlfriend pictures why i love you poems
skd
08-21 11:14 AM
Any body ELse Got Recipt form Texas Center
hairstyles i miss you love poems.
little_willy
01-23 10:03 PM
Nixtor - If you talk to an attorney, please post your response here. I am sure this will help many out here. I will also try to get some answers from my company's attorney.
GCBy3000
11-19 11:07 AM
If you consider waiting from Feb 2005 is too long, then what you would say for those guys stuck still in BEC from 1999
Congrats!!! dude..You are waiting from long and deserve it...
Congrats!!! dude..You are waiting from long and deserve it...
vjkypally
03-26 12:39 AM
can you please let me know what RFE was about, PM me if you dont want it to be public.Its more than 7 months for me too.Applied : Jul 7, 2007
RD: Jul 13, 2007
RFE: Mar 6, 2008
Yet to reply to RFE..
RD: Jul 13, 2007
RFE: Mar 6, 2008
Yet to reply to RFE..
No comments:
Post a Comment