CADude
03-04 12:36 PM
Today I called. Automated phone system didn't provided me option 3 and 4 after "keep listening to updates on case" step. It's said invalid option. Second try again I think used 3,3,1 which takes me level 1 CC. Luckily level 1 guy asked few questions(last name, first name, receipt#, dob, A#, etc, etc.) and let me go to Level-2. Level-2 again asked me for same info (last name, first name, A#, etc, etc.) but told me "call after March 10th 2008". So not much success. What a wastage of time. :(
this is called inter filing.
you please call USCIS and follow up on your case,let me see what they say.
to call USCIS short cut is
just call 18003755283
1
2
2
6
1
enter receipt number
1
1
keep listening to updates on case
3
4 you will be connecting to iio (2nd level immigration officer who is more educated and will speak nicely)
this is called inter filing.
you please call USCIS and follow up on your case,let me see what they say.
to call USCIS short cut is
just call 18003755283
1
2
2
6
1
enter receipt number
1
1
keep listening to updates on case
3
4 you will be connecting to iio (2nd level immigration officer who is more educated and will speak nicely)
wallpaper the official #39;#39;v for
![natalie portman v for vendetta dress. V for Vendetta [Pamp;S] directed](http://cdn3.iofferphoto.com/img/item/203/513/734/dvd-v-for-vendetta-p-s-cd9a7.jpg "V for Vendetta [Pamp;S] directed")
dbevis
January 30th, 2004, 09:42 AM
Nikon will have to make some major adjustments in their operations to keep in the game. They seem to be much less agile than Canon. Nikon is somewhat less innovative, and my sense is the are mainly trading on reputation instead of innovation.
Nikon is more or less forced into being the way they are because they do not have the diversification into other product lines, as is the case with Canon.
Nikon is more or less forced into being the way they are because they do not have the diversification into other product lines, as is the case with Canon.
GCWhru
09-19 06:48 PM
Funny to read this thread, another lighten up thread. :)
2011 V for Vendetta [Pamp;S] directed
anilsal
12-03 09:54 AM
I said I will get stamping done before I return from India for the first time. That way the action of getting I-94 at POE upto Feb28,2007 by official does not arise.
I just want to tell the community that such issues due to "Last Action" can arise and we need to be aware of them. ;)
I just want to tell the community that such issues due to "Last Action" can arise and we need to be aware of them. ;)
more...
Rb_newsletter
08-20 03:24 PM
Country caps, recapture, STEM exemption kind of provisions are the only hope.
Just for my understanding, why are we not talking about excluding dependents from EB count? If each primary applicant consumes nearly 2.5 visa, then excluding dependents will definitely be useful.
We don't talk about this because it is not feasible to achieve? Or does it slips out of our mind?
NB: I am not sure about the number 2.5; I remember this number from another thread.
Just for my understanding, why are we not talking about excluding dependents from EB count? If each primary applicant consumes nearly 2.5 visa, then excluding dependents will definitely be useful.
We don't talk about this because it is not feasible to achieve? Or does it slips out of our mind?
NB: I am not sure about the number 2.5; I remember this number from another thread.
DesiGuy
10-14 08:47 AM
surprising to see EB3 move by 3 months (to Oct 2001).
more...
yellowrocket
08-26 01:49 AM
Just got my license renew in CO. Besides CO complying with the Real ID Act, Mr. Owens the governor call a special session to pass legislation to require people to be cleared (legally can be here) in order to get benefits. So before you get your DL, you need to be clear by going through the Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program (http://www.uscis.gov/graphics/services/SAVE.htm). Basically another federal database that is expose to local govt. If they SAVE doesn't respond with clearance right away, then you need to provide documentation of why you have lawful presence in the US and give the DMV a stamped legal size envelope so DMV can mail out to Homeland Security. I didn't clear at first but since the DMV initiated the search and told Homeland Security that they will be mailing documents in, Homeland Security actually did some more checks just to avoid more paperwork. I got clearance 1.5hrs after the initial query. My wife got clearance on the spot. There was a fellow before me that was trying to find out why he and his wife still haven't cleared. Its been 3 weeks and of course his license is expired. For those on the 1 yr renewal of h1b and waiting for their gc, they have to renew their license every yr. That means we need to pay the renewal fee every yr. I know this isn't really a Head Tax but in reality, as a legal immigrant, I'm paying more than the regular permanent resident and american citizen to get a DL. Also the politicians just don't think things out clearly. The right DL should not be use as main identification. The original purpose of a DL is to show proof that you're competent, have been tested on your ability to drive and understand the rules of the road. They're not just hurting legal immigrants, they're hurting their own American citizens (children born to legal immigrants). These children won't get the freedom to move about, etc. PS, the SAVE program even affect American Citizens. If somehow 20 yrs ago, someone makes a typo, the DMV won't find you so you would have to go through the SAVE program to get cleared.
2010 V for Vendetta,
PD_Dec2002
03-20 08:19 AM
Typical response just to defend......green card might be least of my priorities....but may be its your only priority for you !!!!!
You still haven't shown me the text from any of the three bills that says Masters in STEM are exempt from the EB cap. After all, that's the only thing that will prove you or me wrong.
Regards,
Jayant
You still haven't shown me the text from any of the three bills that says Masters in STEM are exempt from the EB cap. After all, that's the only thing that will prove you or me wrong.
Regards,
Jayant
more...
telekinesis
05-21 07:10 PM
Sounds good, I don't visually see anything from my volley in there, but I guess it's in the .psd so I will get to it soon.
hair Labels: Natalie Portman, V for
rajubuthi
08-17 12:48 PM
This was filed under EB2..
PERM went smooth without any audit.. and also There is no RFE for I-140. My company just received a denial letter..
PERM went smooth without any audit.. and also There is no RFE for I-140. My company just received a denial letter..
more...
Dhundhun
04-02 09:22 PM
So for PD used to retrogress, after going though document other things also have retrogressed, e.g.:
-- Name check
-- Multi year EAD
Thanks HV000. It gave realistic status.
-- Name check
-- Multi year EAD
Thanks HV000. It gave realistic status.
hot Actress Natalie Portman#39;s
gsc999
03-27 04:43 PM
gsc u r a lil confused
speaker pelosi is the head of the house of representatives (Lok Sabha) with Steny Hoyer serving as majority leader in the House and Senator Reid is the majority leader of the Senate (Rajya Sabha). The president of the senate is the VP
Both have floor schedules and have issues that need to be debated on. the bill has to pass in both houses..either with the exact same wording or alternate text that will be reconciled in conference committee
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-senate
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives
---
Yaba:
The title of this thread is discussion on Senate floor in May 14-21, no confusion about that. Reid will schedule the debate not Pelosi. I don't know if you have even read the article quoted here? It clearly mentions Hoyer in House and Reid in Senate. If nat23 had said why is Hoyer driving the agenda in house and not Pelosi? That would make perfect sense but how can Pelosi drive Senate agenda. My response was to that point. If you still argue that, I think you might need to clarify things at your end.
Also, the example you cite isn't appropriate to the context because both Indian Lok Sabha and the British House of Commons have a non-partisan Speaker. He resigns from his primary party as soon as he becomes the speaker. This is not the case in US congress, speaker of the US house of congress is a partisan leader. The implication is that Hoyer, even though a majority House leader may not drive the agenda and this connects to the point made earlier: Pelosi vs Hoyer not Pelosi vs Reid.
speaker pelosi is the head of the house of representatives (Lok Sabha) with Steny Hoyer serving as majority leader in the House and Senator Reid is the majority leader of the Senate (Rajya Sabha). The president of the senate is the VP
Both have floor schedules and have issues that need to be debated on. the bill has to pass in both houses..either with the exact same wording or alternate text that will be reconciled in conference committee
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-senate
http://www.answers.com/topic/party-leaders-of-the-united-states-house-of-representatives
---
Yaba:
The title of this thread is discussion on Senate floor in May 14-21, no confusion about that. Reid will schedule the debate not Pelosi. I don't know if you have even read the article quoted here? It clearly mentions Hoyer in House and Reid in Senate. If nat23 had said why is Hoyer driving the agenda in house and not Pelosi? That would make perfect sense but how can Pelosi drive Senate agenda. My response was to that point. If you still argue that, I think you might need to clarify things at your end.
Also, the example you cite isn't appropriate to the context because both Indian Lok Sabha and the British House of Commons have a non-partisan Speaker. He resigns from his primary party as soon as he becomes the speaker. This is not the case in US congress, speaker of the US house of congress is a partisan leader. The implication is that Hoyer, even though a majority House leader may not drive the agenda and this connects to the point made earlier: Pelosi vs Hoyer not Pelosi vs Reid.
more...
house with Natalie Portman.
pappu
04-28 10:23 AM
We see a lot of these articles every day praising illegal immigration. How about creating a google group with volunteers that will pick up such similar articels and post a rebuttal, either online or through another website?
The one we discussed yesterday was about how illegals contribute to the economy by paying $1.5 Billion in income tax for an estimated 15-20 million illegals.
This was estimated from the 2010 Census data.
We could initially post these rebuttals online on probably a section of the IV website and also send it to other news sites.
People who are good at parsing excel/MDB, csv sheets will be useful.
Most people are not aware of our issues and contributions to society.
Good idea.
What we need is:
1- A document about the economic impact legal immigrants are making (H1, L1, EAD etc). It should include estimates of Federal, state, SS tax and sales taxes. You can also include estimates how we can impact economy by buying houses. Use the research document used by another organization someone posted yesterday to understand how such documents are written. Get some number crunchers and people with good writing skills in your team. There was a google group created by GC_peshwa yesterday. I think this group could do such proactive work. Set your timelines and work on it. You can post updates of your group on the forum so that others know about it and can join if interested. Once you finish the document, it can be sent as a release and also sent to reporters and lawmakers.
2. This group can also work on your idea from the post by posting on other news sites.
I think these are the kind of action items our community must be doing proactively. What we see on forums and websites are people wasting time on trackers, useless discussions on anti H4, EB2EB3, Andhra, spillover fights, pulling each other down etc. Such shameful posts either shows that these people do not really care about greencard issue or are just plain ignorant. Very rarely do we see someone thinking beyond their own case and PD. This is the main reason in my opinion why everyone is suffering from backlogs. It is not the fault of USCIS or government or any one else. The reason is each one of us that thinks narrowly and has chosen to accept the problem rather than doing something about it. As IV members it is our responsibility to help make people aware and urge them to work together on something meaningful that would help the community.
Thanks for taking this initiative. Good luck. Let us know whenever you need help. Others that are interested should express interest on the thread and join the group.
The one we discussed yesterday was about how illegals contribute to the economy by paying $1.5 Billion in income tax for an estimated 15-20 million illegals.
This was estimated from the 2010 Census data.
We could initially post these rebuttals online on probably a section of the IV website and also send it to other news sites.
People who are good at parsing excel/MDB, csv sheets will be useful.
Most people are not aware of our issues and contributions to society.
Good idea.
What we need is:
1- A document about the economic impact legal immigrants are making (H1, L1, EAD etc). It should include estimates of Federal, state, SS tax and sales taxes. You can also include estimates how we can impact economy by buying houses. Use the research document used by another organization someone posted yesterday to understand how such documents are written. Get some number crunchers and people with good writing skills in your team. There was a google group created by GC_peshwa yesterday. I think this group could do such proactive work. Set your timelines and work on it. You can post updates of your group on the forum so that others know about it and can join if interested. Once you finish the document, it can be sent as a release and also sent to reporters and lawmakers.
2. This group can also work on your idea from the post by posting on other news sites.
I think these are the kind of action items our community must be doing proactively. What we see on forums and websites are people wasting time on trackers, useless discussions on anti H4, EB2EB3, Andhra, spillover fights, pulling each other down etc. Such shameful posts either shows that these people do not really care about greencard issue or are just plain ignorant. Very rarely do we see someone thinking beyond their own case and PD. This is the main reason in my opinion why everyone is suffering from backlogs. It is not the fault of USCIS or government or any one else. The reason is each one of us that thinks narrowly and has chosen to accept the problem rather than doing something about it. As IV members it is our responsibility to help make people aware and urge them to work together on something meaningful that would help the community.
Thanks for taking this initiative. Good luck. Let us know whenever you need help. Others that are interested should express interest on the thread and join the group.
tattoo V for Vendetta,
Reub
February 4th, 2004, 08:46 PM
I think they may make a strong fight back with the D70, that looks like a lot of camera for a great price.
Absolutely, D70... looks like a good camera and nice features, but uglier then a hat full of spiders. It looks like the sigma! bit more effort in the body design department wouldn't have gone astray. Its the Volvo of the DSLR world.
Absolutely, D70... looks like a good camera and nice features, but uglier then a hat full of spiders. It looks like the sigma! bit more effort in the body design department wouldn't have gone astray. Its the Volvo of the DSLR world.
more...
pictures love with Natalie Portman.
jnicklo
04-17 11:48 PM
*sigh*
It all depends on what the employer is looking for.
Like I said, if you need tips on finding your first, second, third job let me know. I'll be more than happy to help.
Lou - Go do something useful and comment on the work I posted in Showcase.
It all depends on what the employer is looking for.
Like I said, if you need tips on finding your first, second, third job let me know. I'll be more than happy to help.
Lou - Go do something useful and comment on the work I posted in Showcase.
dresses Re: Natalie Portman
optimystic
02-15 09:01 PM
Ok, so my PD got current (EB3 India). What next?
1) I dont think I can expect that my PD remains current in the next Visa bulletin as well. The dates might retrogress again...right?
2) When will they open my case for adjudication? Will it happen within the month of March? Will ALL cases eligble to be opened in a particular Visa bulletin month are GURANTEED to be opened atleast to determine the next step (like sending it to namecheck, FP etc ) for that case?
(Dont tell me nothing is GUARANTEED with USCIS :) . I mean to a reasonable levels of the word 'GUARANTEE' ! )
3) What further factors/queues/backlogs determine when a case will be opened for adjudication when the PD is current and I-140 is also already approved & FP done.
4) Namecheck - The new rule of auto-approval/clearance past 180 days.....when does the 180 day count start from?
--- Receipt date of I-485 application OR
--- Date when the application is opened for adjudication following the PD becoming current for that person OR
--- How can one find out what their namecheck status is? If we are past 180 days, is it safe to assume that we are cleared on Namecheck?
5) Will anything at all happen in my case during the remaining of this month Feb? Like pre-adjudication of my case etc in anticipation of my PD becoming current in March (as you can see by my IV handle name....hihgly optimistic :) ) ....
6)Should I be watching out for any LUDs this month or don't even bother until March
I hope the other IV brethren who might have already got their GCs and other Gurus/experts on the forum can probably shed some light on these questions, the time lines/milestones involved etc
Thanks in advance.
1) I dont think I can expect that my PD remains current in the next Visa bulletin as well. The dates might retrogress again...right?
2) When will they open my case for adjudication? Will it happen within the month of March? Will ALL cases eligble to be opened in a particular Visa bulletin month are GURANTEED to be opened atleast to determine the next step (like sending it to namecheck, FP etc ) for that case?
(Dont tell me nothing is GUARANTEED with USCIS :) . I mean to a reasonable levels of the word 'GUARANTEE' ! )
3) What further factors/queues/backlogs determine when a case will be opened for adjudication when the PD is current and I-140 is also already approved & FP done.
4) Namecheck - The new rule of auto-approval/clearance past 180 days.....when does the 180 day count start from?
--- Receipt date of I-485 application OR
--- Date when the application is opened for adjudication following the PD becoming current for that person OR
--- How can one find out what their namecheck status is? If we are past 180 days, is it safe to assume that we are cleared on Namecheck?
5) Will anything at all happen in my case during the remaining of this month Feb? Like pre-adjudication of my case etc in anticipation of my PD becoming current in March (as you can see by my IV handle name....hihgly optimistic :) ) ....
6)Should I be watching out for any LUDs this month or don't even bother until March
I hope the other IV brethren who might have already got their GCs and other Gurus/experts on the forum can probably shed some light on these questions, the time lines/milestones involved etc
Thanks in advance.
more...
makeup Natalie Portman shaved her
akhichopra
03-01 07:55 PM
Thanks for your kind reply. Yes this amount of 40K is what i saved from my salary after my employer deducts taxes via withholding. I am confused because I read that you have to declare any foriegn accounts help while filling for taxes here in US. I made these trasnfers to my dad's account and I dont have any NRI account. I am not sure if I will fall into this category and have to declare all this. Thanks again for your help.
girlfriend natalie portman your highness
sanju
04-04 01:28 PM
BTW, I am not on "L" visa so plese don't make it sound like L1 V/s H1.
hairstyles quot;V for Vendettaquot; (2006)
smccrea
03-08 11:33 AM
Green Card nahin mila H1 me he Khush raho ?? ;)
I like this...thanks form a nice afternoon laff! :D
Could you share the joke with those of us who don't read this language?
I like this...thanks form a nice afternoon laff! :D
Could you share the joke with those of us who don't read this language?
watzgc
04-02 06:44 PM
Watzgc,
Did your employer get a new LCA for the CA project when you changed projects? ... just one more thing to check before you send in the RFE response with new contract.
Hi Sid,
My employer is based on CA and my present clinet is within 40 miles from my employer office. still do I need to get LCA ?.
Thanks,
watgc
Did your employer get a new LCA for the CA project when you changed projects? ... just one more thing to check before you send in the RFE response with new contract.
Hi Sid,
My employer is based on CA and my present clinet is within 40 miles from my employer office. still do I need to get LCA ?.
Thanks,
watgc
Leo07
02-25 07:13 AM
Although I agree with you on principle...that cannot bring people in numbers. There will always be people who don't agree with each other. leadership involves channeling both parties energies, those who agree with me and those who don't agree. Sounding arrogant, feeling proud of what I did better than others and looking down upon people who don't agree with me, doesn't help me, right? Who am I to judge somebody's attitude and achievements?
Priceless!
Speechless!
Such attitude is Worthless! How confident should we be that they will stick to the message and not go of on tangent in the meeting? It may be better off not to have them.
If people believe a cause is worthwhile and will benefit them, they will come - and registering will not be an issue for them.
If people don't want to do the heavy lifting, they will give any excuse - including registering as the detractor to join the cause. The change has to come from within and cannot be forced. You can talk to a person who has a question on what needs to be done during the advocacy days, you can talk to a person who has doubts - if he/she can be reasoned with, but you are wasting time with people who have no intention of participating to begin with!
Priceless!
Speechless!
Such attitude is Worthless! How confident should we be that they will stick to the message and not go of on tangent in the meeting? It may be better off not to have them.
If people believe a cause is worthwhile and will benefit them, they will come - and registering will not be an issue for them.
If people don't want to do the heavy lifting, they will give any excuse - including registering as the detractor to join the cause. The change has to come from within and cannot be forced. You can talk to a person who has a question on what needs to be done during the advocacy days, you can talk to a person who has doubts - if he/she can be reasoned with, but you are wasting time with people who have no intention of participating to begin with!
No comments:
Post a Comment