va_labor2002
06-22 09:17 PM
I think, if at all Minister is being planned to be met , it is better only few problems are presented to Minister.
PROBLEMS IN INDIA MAY DILUTE THE FOCUS. I think the following would be best to present ..
1) Retrogression.
2) Social Security Treaty.
Numbers justifying above data can do a lot good to explain the problem.
I think VISA retrogression problem can be addressed to the minister. That itself will give BIG relief to thousands of people from India.Make a special VISA Quota for India is another good option. Minister can suggest this option to the US Officials and Senators ! He is scheduled to meet some US senators in DC and NYC.
This is great opportunity for poeple living in Maryland and DC area. It is easy to go and meet him personally ! Think about it guys....
PROBLEMS IN INDIA MAY DILUTE THE FOCUS. I think the following would be best to present ..
1) Retrogression.
2) Social Security Treaty.
Numbers justifying above data can do a lot good to explain the problem.
I think VISA retrogression problem can be addressed to the minister. That itself will give BIG relief to thousands of people from India.Make a special VISA Quota for India is another good option. Minister can suggest this option to the US Officials and Senators ! He is scheduled to meet some US senators in DC and NYC.
This is great opportunity for poeple living in Maryland and DC area. It is easy to go and meet him personally ! Think about it guys....
wallpaper UV Responsive Ink Tattooing by
krishnam70
08-14 11:21 PM
My F1 visa was rejected for no good reason long back, before i even came on H1B. So its kind of scary every time I have to go for visa stamping. Its very random. Guess its just the fear inside me.
So I guess its all about the risk, if or not I want to get my H1B visa stamped or just wait for the freaking AP.
I was in the same boat as you and came here subsequently on H1. I do not think your F1 reject has any bearing on your H1 stamping both are different. If your stay in the US has been lawful, no gaps, out of status etc then you should be good be in good shape. You know the drill on the documents to carry etc if needed to get the stamping out of country.
cheers
So I guess its all about the risk, if or not I want to get my H1B visa stamped or just wait for the freaking AP.
I was in the same boat as you and came here subsequently on H1. I do not think your F1 reject has any bearing on your H1 stamping both are different. If your stay in the US has been lawful, no gaps, out of status etc then you should be good be in good shape. You know the drill on the documents to carry etc if needed to get the stamping out of country.
cheers
Munna Bhai
10-16 11:45 AM
Hi ,
I received RFE on my I-131 application asking for all the I-94's that is being issued to me.
I had been in and out of US many times and there's lot if I-94's involved and I don't anything with me except the latest. What options do I have?... Also couple of times during my earlier trip (initial visits in US), the AIR Line didn't even take the I-94 from my Passport which ultimately I lost.
My Passport has all the entries indicating my Date in and Date out...
Gurus - What do you advise on my case...
Anybody's input are highly appreciated and I know we could somehow get the I-94 copies by requesting USCIS. (That is time consuming)... I have to respond in next five to ten days...
What options do I have?...
Thanks.
Your issue is that airline didn't took I-94 and that doesn't match with what uscis has. So be honest and give them whatever you have.
I received RFE on my I-131 application asking for all the I-94's that is being issued to me.
I had been in and out of US many times and there's lot if I-94's involved and I don't anything with me except the latest. What options do I have?... Also couple of times during my earlier trip (initial visits in US), the AIR Line didn't even take the I-94 from my Passport which ultimately I lost.
My Passport has all the entries indicating my Date in and Date out...
Gurus - What do you advise on my case...
Anybody's input are highly appreciated and I know we could somehow get the I-94 copies by requesting USCIS. (That is time consuming)... I have to respond in next five to ten days...
What options do I have?...
Thanks.
Your issue is that airline didn't took I-94 and that doesn't match with what uscis has. So be honest and give them whatever you have.
2011 UV Reactive Tattoo Ink
waitin_toolong
08-24 10:52 AM
no EAD will just be the basis for her SSN. it will just hurry up the process. What status she will be in will be determined by the I-9 form that will say H1.
more...
EkAurAaya
08-07 06:12 PM
IV is the only group that is trying something for EB gc's!!! If you don't agree with IV mission statement - least you can do is SHUT UP! If you have other selfish agenda's take them some place else... don't use IV as a platform to segregate a group.
(In my personal opinion... IV should BAN anyone who suggests anything that breaks this group down! Enough is ENOUGH!)
____________________________
Mission Statement
The mission of Immigration Voice is to organize grassroots efforts and resources to solve several problems in the employment based green card process including (a) delays due to Retrogression (visa number unavailability for certain employment-based categories) (b) delays due to USCIS processing backlogs and (c) delays due to Labor Certification backlogs. We will work to remove these and other flaws by supporting changes to immigration law for high-skilled legal employment-based immigrants. High-skilled legal immigrants strengthen the United States' economy and help maintain American technological superiority.
_____________________________
P.S sorry for the rant - but some of the threads are really disappointing... EB2 vs EB3, Masters vs Non-masters....
(In my personal opinion... IV should BAN anyone who suggests anything that breaks this group down! Enough is ENOUGH!)
____________________________
Mission Statement
The mission of Immigration Voice is to organize grassroots efforts and resources to solve several problems in the employment based green card process including (a) delays due to Retrogression (visa number unavailability for certain employment-based categories) (b) delays due to USCIS processing backlogs and (c) delays due to Labor Certification backlogs. We will work to remove these and other flaws by supporting changes to immigration law for high-skilled legal employment-based immigrants. High-skilled legal immigrants strengthen the United States' economy and help maintain American technological superiority.
_____________________________
P.S sorry for the rant - but some of the threads are really disappointing... EB2 vs EB3, Masters vs Non-masters....
![uv tattoo ink. [image] We have Skin Candy 8](http://www.houseofrave.com/media/blacklight/swivel-blacklight-big3.jpg "[image] We have Skin Candy 8")
nocomment
10-14 05:32 PM
There is a section in 485 application to list your spouse and dependents. Talk to a good lawyer to see if you can still add her. Or you can live in india until you figure out a way to bring her here on student visa or something.
more...
rimzhim
02-08 07:39 PM
Check this (http://www.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=240431)out. No need to look at the bulletin for the next 6 months.:mad:
should we believe someone who justs says he/she has insider information? Who is this guy berkeleybee anyway?
should we believe someone who justs says he/she has insider information? Who is this guy berkeleybee anyway?
2010 quot;Live Lifequot; UV ink knuckle
subba
12-05 05:14 PM
What do you mean? I thought we can only get it stamped outside US.
That is what my attorney kind of said as well. The thing is there is really no
"start date" on the visa stamp so clubbing the I797's is effectively the same
as honoring the second I797 (as far as the date on the I797 is concerned).
My only concern in that case if the officer at the port of entry has any issues because of the two I797's.
Are you planning to get it stamped when you are outside US?
I just talked to my attorney and he says that the US Embassy will club both the 797 dates and give you a combined visa. I still would like to confirm it with other sources as it sounds too good to be true.
That is what my attorney kind of said as well. The thing is there is really no
"start date" on the visa stamp so clubbing the I797's is effectively the same
as honoring the second I797 (as far as the date on the I797 is concerned).
My only concern in that case if the officer at the port of entry has any issues because of the two I797's.
Are you planning to get it stamped when you are outside US?
I just talked to my attorney and he says that the US Embassy will club both the 797 dates and give you a combined visa. I still would like to confirm it with other sources as it sounds too good to be true.
more...
seeking_GC
02-25 02:08 AM
Can you share which application this was for?
hair Black Light Tattoos
h1techSlave
08-20 11:43 AM
It is my understanding that many GC applicants do not need labor clearance. Nurses, EB1 folks etc. etc. So the total demand for GC = 30K labor cases + 100K non-labor cases. That would only leave 10K for retrogressed countries.
Due to the economic downturn there aren't many companies sponsoring GCs for employees. I doubt it would be more than 20 to 30k per year from now. This leaves 100-110k visas available every year for retrogressed countries like india and china
if there 300-400k pending GC applications in all categories then shouldn't all of us get our GC in next 3-4 years?
Due to the economic downturn there aren't many companies sponsoring GCs for employees. I doubt it would be more than 20 to 30k per year from now. This leaves 100-110k visas available every year for retrogressed countries like india and china
if there 300-400k pending GC applications in all categories then shouldn't all of us get our GC in next 3-4 years?
more...
walking_dude
11-19 11:53 AM
Congrats to Goan2005.
For a lot of others it's a long wait. Unless you used substitution labor to jump the line, increasing the Visa numbers, elimination of country quotas is your only hope. IV is the only organization/movement working for it.
Be part of the movement to get those LUDs in your case. Real status is - 'Case Approved'. Rest all are passe. Work for the real thing.
For a lot of others it's a long wait. Unless you used substitution labor to jump the line, increasing the Visa numbers, elimination of country quotas is your only hope. IV is the only organization/movement working for it.
Be part of the movement to get those LUDs in your case. Real status is - 'Case Approved'. Rest all are passe. Work for the real thing.
hot uv tattoo ink.
kommisetty
08-21 03:21 PM
Even though i didn't get my GC yet this info is helpful.;)
PD : 2005 Oct. I-485 Still pending :confused:
Hi guys,
...
followup post:
I think there is a mix up here between two things:
180 day clock does start on the first day after filing 485, but that is for the purpose of AC21. Once you use AC21, then the next employer assumes the role of "your future permanent employer" and you should have "intent to permanently work for that(new, not the sponsoring) employer" AT the time of GC approval.
If you use change the employers 7 times using AC21 before your GC gets approved; you should have "intent to work permanently for the latest employer".
You are not bonded slaves. The only issue is that the "burden of proof" of proving the intent to work for such and such employer is on the GC beneficiary and not on USCIS. So in future, if USCIS questions (or CBP questions), it is YOU who has to prove that intent.
One scenario where you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT: if you never worked for the sponsoring employer.
One scenario where you WILL NOT HAVE A PROBLEM PROVING IT: if you worked with sponsoring (or latest AC21) employer after GC approval for some duration (60 days?? 90 days?? 6 months?? 1 year??)...no law on this.
This is the whole purpose of Labor Certification process and I140. And it applies to the categories of EB2 (except NIW) and EB3--any category that requires LC.
This is from my discussion in following thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/sh...ad.php?t=20403
I just put it here so that everyone would not have to try the link and may be this information is useful to someone.
Good Luck.
PD : 2005 Oct. I-485 Still pending :confused:
Hi guys,
...
followup post:
I think there is a mix up here between two things:
180 day clock does start on the first day after filing 485, but that is for the purpose of AC21. Once you use AC21, then the next employer assumes the role of "your future permanent employer" and you should have "intent to permanently work for that(new, not the sponsoring) employer" AT the time of GC approval.
If you use change the employers 7 times using AC21 before your GC gets approved; you should have "intent to work permanently for the latest employer".
You are not bonded slaves. The only issue is that the "burden of proof" of proving the intent to work for such and such employer is on the GC beneficiary and not on USCIS. So in future, if USCIS questions (or CBP questions), it is YOU who has to prove that intent.
One scenario where you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT: if you never worked for the sponsoring employer.
One scenario where you WILL NOT HAVE A PROBLEM PROVING IT: if you worked with sponsoring (or latest AC21) employer after GC approval for some duration (60 days?? 90 days?? 6 months?? 1 year??)...no law on this.
This is the whole purpose of Labor Certification process and I140. And it applies to the categories of EB2 (except NIW) and EB3--any category that requires LC.
This is from my discussion in following thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/sh...ad.php?t=20403
I just put it here so that everyone would not have to try the link and may be this information is useful to someone.
Good Luck.
more...
house UV ink used to highlight a
gotgc?
12-20 09:28 AM
bumping...
tattoo [image] We have Skin Candy 8
kondur_007
08-13 04:20 PM
Hi guys,
I dont want to duplicate, but I think following "cut and paste" from my previous post may be a fair thing to do; just for the information.
I am not a lawyer; but this is what I believe to the best of my knowledge:
1. If you never used AC21 (still working with the employer who sponsored I 140); your obligation at the time of GC approval is to have a "good faith intention to work with the same employer permanently". It is not clear in the law as to how would you prove that intention...most people say that you should work for some duration (6 months or 12 months at least...or something like that) after GC is approved to "show" your good faith intention.
2. If you ported to employer B using AC 21 (before the approval of GC); you have the same obligation to the new employer B and NO obligation to original I 140 sponsoring employer. (this is especially true if you informed USCIS of your porting and also true if you did not inform USCIS but law is less clear in the later scenario)
There is really no law that specifies the duration.
All it says is :"you should have intention to work for the GC sponsoring employer (or AC21 employer if you ported) permanently."
Intention is a state of mind and it can change!! also all these employments are at will, and so it is possible that you may not like that job! Or on the other hand employer may not like you and fire you in a week.
Bottomline: You will be fine under most circumstances. However, if the issue is raised at the time of naturalization, it would be much easier for you to explain/show that you did have intention to work for the employer if you actually work for the sponsoring employer for some duration (6 months, 1 year...all these are arbitrary numbers).
If you never worked for the sponsoring employer, you may not have a lot of grounds to show that entire GC was not a fraud...
Again, there is no clear law on this...
followup post:
I think there is a mix up here between two things:
180 day clock does start on the first day after filing 485, but that is for the purpose of AC21. Once you use AC21, then the next employer assumes the role of "your future permanent employer" and you should have "intent to permanently work for that(new, not the sponsoring) employer" AT the time of GC approval.
If you use change the employers 7 times using AC21 before your GC gets approved; you should have "intent to work permanently for the latest employer".
You are not bonded slaves. The only issue is that the "burden of proof" of proving the intent to work for such and such employer is on the GC beneficiary and not on USCIS. So in future, if USCIS questions (or CBP questions), it is YOU who has to prove that intent.
One scenario where you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT: if you never worked for the sponsoring employer.
One scenario where you WILL NOT HAVE A PROBLEM PROVING IT: if you worked with sponsoring (or latest AC21) employer after GC approval for some duration (60 days?? 90 days?? 6 months?? 1 year??)...no law on this.
This is the whole purpose of Labor Certification process and I140. And it applies to the categories of EB2 (except NIW) and EB3--any category that requires LC.
This is from my discussion in following thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/sh...ad.php?t=20403
I just put it here so that everyone would not have to try the link and may be this information is useful to someone.
Good Luck.
I dont want to duplicate, but I think following "cut and paste" from my previous post may be a fair thing to do; just for the information.
I am not a lawyer; but this is what I believe to the best of my knowledge:
1. If you never used AC21 (still working with the employer who sponsored I 140); your obligation at the time of GC approval is to have a "good faith intention to work with the same employer permanently". It is not clear in the law as to how would you prove that intention...most people say that you should work for some duration (6 months or 12 months at least...or something like that) after GC is approved to "show" your good faith intention.
2. If you ported to employer B using AC 21 (before the approval of GC); you have the same obligation to the new employer B and NO obligation to original I 140 sponsoring employer. (this is especially true if you informed USCIS of your porting and also true if you did not inform USCIS but law is less clear in the later scenario)
There is really no law that specifies the duration.
All it says is :"you should have intention to work for the GC sponsoring employer (or AC21 employer if you ported) permanently."
Intention is a state of mind and it can change!! also all these employments are at will, and so it is possible that you may not like that job! Or on the other hand employer may not like you and fire you in a week.
Bottomline: You will be fine under most circumstances. However, if the issue is raised at the time of naturalization, it would be much easier for you to explain/show that you did have intention to work for the employer if you actually work for the sponsoring employer for some duration (6 months, 1 year...all these are arbitrary numbers).
If you never worked for the sponsoring employer, you may not have a lot of grounds to show that entire GC was not a fraud...
Again, there is no clear law on this...
followup post:
I think there is a mix up here between two things:
180 day clock does start on the first day after filing 485, but that is for the purpose of AC21. Once you use AC21, then the next employer assumes the role of "your future permanent employer" and you should have "intent to permanently work for that(new, not the sponsoring) employer" AT the time of GC approval.
If you use change the employers 7 times using AC21 before your GC gets approved; you should have "intent to work permanently for the latest employer".
You are not bonded slaves. The only issue is that the "burden of proof" of proving the intent to work for such and such employer is on the GC beneficiary and not on USCIS. So in future, if USCIS questions (or CBP questions), it is YOU who has to prove that intent.
One scenario where you WILL NOT BE ABLE TO PROVE IT: if you never worked for the sponsoring employer.
One scenario where you WILL NOT HAVE A PROBLEM PROVING IT: if you worked with sponsoring (or latest AC21) employer after GC approval for some duration (60 days?? 90 days?? 6 months?? 1 year??)...no law on this.
This is the whole purpose of Labor Certification process and I140. And it applies to the categories of EB2 (except NIW) and EB3--any category that requires LC.
This is from my discussion in following thread:
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/sh...ad.php?t=20403
I just put it here so that everyone would not have to try the link and may be this information is useful to someone.
Good Luck.
more...
pictures UV Ink Tattoos
shukla77
06-25 01:08 PM
So Mr Nangu Teli,:D
What exacly do you propose that we should do? Other than saying contribute and join the state chapters.
What exacly do you propose that we should do? Other than saying contribute and join the state chapters.
dresses black light tattoo ink.
yabadaba
12-14 12:41 PM
isnt the ielts offered in very few places in the US?
more...
makeup Black Light Tattoos - Spiders,
hopefullegalimmigrant
04-16 11:50 AM
JOb title/Description is significantly similar. I will inform USCIS. I am really glad we have this option so we can make choices on what is the best place to work for us rather than get beat up by fate and long timelines and stick to someplace where one is not happy or progressing anywhere. My downside is I have to sell my house :(
girlfriend Uv Tattoo Uv Tattoos and
bigboy007
11-19 04:53 PM
enough is enough on good old Divide and conquer policy... collective we are will achieve something divided we are Definitely we will achieve some thing which is nothing. I support backlog elimination via recapture and removal of per-country limits . PERIOD. No STEM or LEAF or TREE... These are there for distraction..
hairstyles uv tattoo ink.
ashkam
07-10 10:45 AM
How do we know if you have 40 credits?
Where do we check or compute this?
You get a yearly social security "statement" telling you how many credits you have accumulated.
Where do we check or compute this?
You get a yearly social security "statement" telling you how many credits you have accumulated.
acecupid
07-02 05:54 PM
Guys, I think we should have some media coverage for the USCIS and DOS actions. Since immigration news has been hot in the media for a while. It will be easy to get channels to cover this story.
Send emails to news channels to cover the story. You can quote the story from AILA
Administration Slams Door on Thousands of Legal Immigrants: AILA Condemns Agencies� Bait and Switch
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07070264 (posted Jul. 2, 2007)"
CONTACT: George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The American Immigration Lawyers Association strongly condemns the bait and switch perpetrated by the federal government on thousands of intending immigrants who have waited in line for years and were following the rules for obtaining a "green card."
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. State Department announced that, as of July 2, individuals seeking permanent residence ("green cards") through employer sponsorship finally would be allowed to proceed with their applications. Applicants would have a short window, possibly only through July or perhaps August, to complete their paperwork.
Those intending immigrants, immediately and at great expense, rushed to gather final documents, complete their paperwork and obtain required medical exams. Many sent their applications off on Friday, June 29 for arrival on July 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, for the last phase of the multi-step process that leads to a green card.
However, on the very day the door was to open, DOS and DHS slammed it shut.
On July 2, DHS and DOS announced-based on no different information than they had on June 13 when they announced the opening of this filing door-that all applications would be turned away.
"People ask why those who come to the United States illegally can't just follow the rules," said Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "But here people followed the rules and did everything right, yet without warning or explanation the door was slammed in their faces. This hoax perpetrated by these two government agencies is unconscionable, and is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken."
AILA calls on the Administration to do the right thing and keep its promise to the people affected by this sudden reversal. AILA also calls on Congress to get it right this time and fix our badly broken system.
================================================== ========
GENERAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
America's Newsroom � AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com
The Beltway Boys � Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson � Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears � Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin' In � Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business � Cavuto@foxnews.com
FNC iMag � Fncimag@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX � Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends � Friends@foxnews.com
FOX Fan Central � YourComments@foxnews.com
FOX News Live � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby � Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials � Fncspecials@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday � FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch � Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith � Foxreport@foxnews.com
FOX Report Weekend � Foxreport@foxnews.com
Geraldo at Large � Atlarge@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes � Hannity@foxnews.com OR Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich � Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report � JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup � Lineup@foxnews.com
The Live Desk w/ Martha MacCallum � Martha@foxnews.com
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren � Ontherecord@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor � Oreilly@foxnews.com
Red Eye � Redeye@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume � Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith � Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North � Comments@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto � Cavuto@foxnews.com
WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, today@nbc.com, wt@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com, Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com
Send emails to news channels to cover the story. You can quote the story from AILA
Administration Slams Door on Thousands of Legal Immigrants: AILA Condemns Agencies� Bait and Switch
Cite as "AILA InfoNet Doc. No. 07070264 (posted Jul. 2, 2007)"
CONTACT: George Tzamaras
202-216-2410
gtzamaras@aila.org
WASHINGTON, D.C.--The American Immigration Lawyers Association strongly condemns the bait and switch perpetrated by the federal government on thousands of intending immigrants who have waited in line for years and were following the rules for obtaining a "green card."
On June 13, 2007, the U.S. State Department announced that, as of July 2, individuals seeking permanent residence ("green cards") through employer sponsorship finally would be allowed to proceed with their applications. Applicants would have a short window, possibly only through July or perhaps August, to complete their paperwork.
Those intending immigrants, immediately and at great expense, rushed to gather final documents, complete their paperwork and obtain required medical exams. Many sent their applications off on Friday, June 29 for arrival on July 2 at the Department of Homeland Security, for the last phase of the multi-step process that leads to a green card.
However, on the very day the door was to open, DOS and DHS slammed it shut.
On July 2, DHS and DOS announced-based on no different information than they had on June 13 when they announced the opening of this filing door-that all applications would be turned away.
"People ask why those who come to the United States illegally can't just follow the rules," said Kathleen Campbell Walker, President of the American Immigration Lawyers Association. "But here people followed the rules and did everything right, yet without warning or explanation the door was slammed in their faces. This hoax perpetrated by these two government agencies is unconscionable, and is an example of how badly our immigration system is broken."
AILA calls on the Administration to do the right thing and keep its promise to the people affected by this sudden reversal. AILA also calls on Congress to get it right this time and fix our badly broken system.
================================================== ========
GENERAL FOX NEWS CHANNEL E-MAIL ADDRESSES:
America's Newsroom � AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com
The Beltway Boys � Beltway@foxnews.com
The Big Story w/ John Gibson � Myword@foxnews.com
The Big Story Weekend � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
The Big Story Primetime � Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com
Bulls & Bears � Bullsandbears@foxnews.com
Cashin' In � Cash@foxnews.com
Cavuto on Business � Cavuto@foxnews.com
FNC iMag � Fncimag@foxnews.com
Forbes on FOX � Forbes@foxnews.com
FOX & Friends � Friends@foxnews.com
FOX Fan Central � YourComments@foxnews.com
FOX News Live � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Live w/ Jamie Colby � Jamie@foxnews.com
FOX News Live Weekend � Feedback@foxnews.com
FOX News Specials � Fncspecials@foxnews.com
FOX News Sunday � FNS@foxnews.com
FOX News Watch � Newswatch@foxnews.com
FOX Report w/ Shepard Smith � Foxreport@foxnews.com
FOX Report Weekend � Foxreport@foxnews.com
Geraldo at Large � Atlarge@foxnews.com
Hannity & Colmes � Hannity@foxnews.com OR Colmes@foxnews.com
Heartland w/ John Kasich � Heartland@foxnews.com
The Journal Editorial Report � JER@foxnews.com
The Lineup � Lineup@foxnews.com
The Live Desk w/ Martha MacCallum � Martha@foxnews.com
On the Record w/ Greta Van Susteren � Ontherecord@foxnews.com
The O'Reilly Factor � Oreilly@foxnews.com
Red Eye � Redeye@foxnews.com
Special Report w/ Brit Hume � Special@foxnews.com
Studio B w/ Shepard Smith � Studiob@foxnews.com
War Stories w/ Oliver North � Comments@foxnews.com
Your World w/ Neil Cavuto � Cavuto@foxnews.com
WebEditors@newsweek.com, Letters@newsweek.com, Customer.Care@newsweek.com, viewerservices@msnbc.com, today@nbc.com, wt@nbc.com, mtp@nbc.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com, Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com
RNGC
04-04 02:55 PM
Guys,
You are doing a great job....keep up the good work.
You are doing a great job....keep up the good work.
No comments:
Post a Comment