kumar1
07-11 02:37 PM
They will not get I-94 for more than 6 months. You need to do following things to claim them as dependet(s) -
1. Extend their stay beyond I-94 i.e. 6 months.
2. Get ITIN number for them. (I am not sure how you get it on B1/B2)
This is the primary reason, immigration does not give more than 6 months I-94 on B1/B2 and avoid extending their stay....even if those are genuine reason(s).
1. Extend their stay beyond I-94 i.e. 6 months.
2. Get ITIN number for them. (I am not sure how you get it on B1/B2)
This is the primary reason, immigration does not give more than 6 months I-94 on B1/B2 and avoid extending their stay....even if those are genuine reason(s).
wallpaper disney princesses funny faces. anything Disney Princess.
ultimo
10-03 01:53 PM
Hi,
I'm sorry if this question sounds trivial, what is LUD? My FP was done on Sep 19 and I checked the uscis website today using my i-485 receipt #. I don't see any update. Please let me know.
LUD is the las update date . when u check the receipt no u will find the date
I'm sorry if this question sounds trivial, what is LUD? My FP was done on Sep 19 and I checked the uscis website today using my i-485 receipt #. I don't see any update. Please let me know.
LUD is the las update date . when u check the receipt no u will find the date
nonimmi
06-15 02:27 PM
I guess at least 5-10% of GC applicants are in and around Edison NJ!! You guys will have to fight hard to get into the doc's office. :D
2011 hairstyles disney princesses
raysaikat
07-10 09:39 PM
Thanks for your amazing help.
I have two more question that I am not sure about:
1-I understand from your letter that EB2-NIW has less requirements than EB1-OR, and hence it is more safe to apply for EB2-NIW. Is that true?
The requirements are a bit different. For NIW, you need to show *national* interest/impact of your work; for EB1-OR, it is *international* impact/reputation. In general, it is easier to wriggle out an argument for national interest in one's work than showing international reputation. Moreover, EB2-NIW being EB2 is supposed to be easier to satisfy.
See the following, e.g.:
http://www.usavisanow.com/nationalinterestwaivergreencardinfo.html
With the caveat that I have not seen your C.V., I am fairly certain that if you do go for an EB1-OR application, it would be a weak application at best. With EB2-NIW you might have a better chance.
2-In case I want to apply for EB1-OR, does my company has to sign I-140. I am just worried that they does not want to sponsor me till after 3 years? Does I-140 hurt the company by any means?
Yes, your company must sponsor you (usually the highest HR person has to sign the petition on behalf of the company; not your immediate Boss or colleague). You cannot hide the fact from them.
Thank you,
John
I have two more question that I am not sure about:
1-I understand from your letter that EB2-NIW has less requirements than EB1-OR, and hence it is more safe to apply for EB2-NIW. Is that true?
The requirements are a bit different. For NIW, you need to show *national* interest/impact of your work; for EB1-OR, it is *international* impact/reputation. In general, it is easier to wriggle out an argument for national interest in one's work than showing international reputation. Moreover, EB2-NIW being EB2 is supposed to be easier to satisfy.
See the following, e.g.:
http://www.usavisanow.com/nationalinterestwaivergreencardinfo.html
With the caveat that I have not seen your C.V., I am fairly certain that if you do go for an EB1-OR application, it would be a weak application at best. With EB2-NIW you might have a better chance.
2-In case I want to apply for EB1-OR, does my company has to sign I-140. I am just worried that they does not want to sponsor me till after 3 years? Does I-140 hurt the company by any means?
Yes, your company must sponsor you (usually the highest HR person has to sign the petition on behalf of the company; not your immediate Boss or colleague). You cannot hide the fact from them.
Thank you,
John
more...
keshtwo
07-13 05:03 PM
one GC for each family (3 or 4) members, instead of treating as multiple GC's.
say for a family of 4 uscis is treating it as 4 GC instead they can treat this as a single GC. which will make many people eligible for GC
yo man, that will be something! In your mouth, ghee-sugar - ancient indian saying!
say for a family of 4 uscis is treating it as 4 GC instead they can treat this as a single GC. which will make many people eligible for GC
yo man, that will be something! In your mouth, ghee-sugar - ancient indian saying!
jkamel5
07-10 08:38 PM
Thanks for your amazing help.
I have two more question that I am not sure about:
1-I understand from your letter that EB2-NIW has less requirements than EB1-OR, and hence it is more safe to apply for EB2-NIW. Is that true?
2-In case I want to apply for EB1-OR, does my company has to sign I-140. I am just worried that they does not want to sponsor me till after 3 years? Does I-140 hurt the company by any means?
Thank you,
John
Well, your ideal bet is the standard EB2. It will require a labor certificate. The issue is that the cost of obtaining the labor certificate (including lawyer's fee and job advertisement costs; usually total around $5k-$6k) must be borne by the employer; it is the law. You can bear the rest of the cost (I-140+I-485+lawyer's fee for those two stages). If your employer is willing to at least pay for that, then go for it; you will get your GC within a year or two (assuming no major changes in the rules, situations, etc.).
If your employer is not willing to spend any money, then you have two options: EB1 or EB2-NIW; they do not need labor certificate.
The EB2-NIW category does not need employer's sponsorship. However, a support letter from the employer strengthens the case quite a lot. To prove yourself eligible for EB2-NIW, you need to argue that if a labor test is done and an eligible citizen or permanent resident shows up (and hence you cannot be hired), then it will be a *national* loss to the US. Basically this means you have to prove that your field *and* your individual work in the field are very important to the US nationally (i.e., not just to the particular part of the US where you live/work). Other than publications (number as well as quality), citations, and perhaps most importantly, a set of (10-15) recommendation letters from the well known leaders of your field are usually used to establish this.
The EB1-OR (outstanding researcher) category requires that you be in a "researcher" position and your company employs at least 5 other researchers (I am assuming that you are not a tenure-track faculty member in a US institute of higher education). If this is true, then your employer simply needs to "sponsor" you by providing a support letter. No labor certification is needed; so employer need not bear any cost; you are allowed to pay for the whole process. You need to establish that you are an "outstanding researcher" with international reputation.
From what you have told us, it seems that EB2-NIW might be possible for you, but you very likely do not satisfy EB1-OR's requirements. In any case, there is a good amount of randomness in the process and hence there is always a possibility of getting approved. So if your employer does not want to spend any money and you can spare the money, then it may be worth a shot applying for an EB2-NIW. If you decide to do so, get a good lawyer, though.
I have two more question that I am not sure about:
1-I understand from your letter that EB2-NIW has less requirements than EB1-OR, and hence it is more safe to apply for EB2-NIW. Is that true?
2-In case I want to apply for EB1-OR, does my company has to sign I-140. I am just worried that they does not want to sponsor me till after 3 years? Does I-140 hurt the company by any means?
Thank you,
John
Well, your ideal bet is the standard EB2. It will require a labor certificate. The issue is that the cost of obtaining the labor certificate (including lawyer's fee and job advertisement costs; usually total around $5k-$6k) must be borne by the employer; it is the law. You can bear the rest of the cost (I-140+I-485+lawyer's fee for those two stages). If your employer is willing to at least pay for that, then go for it; you will get your GC within a year or two (assuming no major changes in the rules, situations, etc.).
If your employer is not willing to spend any money, then you have two options: EB1 or EB2-NIW; they do not need labor certificate.
The EB2-NIW category does not need employer's sponsorship. However, a support letter from the employer strengthens the case quite a lot. To prove yourself eligible for EB2-NIW, you need to argue that if a labor test is done and an eligible citizen or permanent resident shows up (and hence you cannot be hired), then it will be a *national* loss to the US. Basically this means you have to prove that your field *and* your individual work in the field are very important to the US nationally (i.e., not just to the particular part of the US where you live/work). Other than publications (number as well as quality), citations, and perhaps most importantly, a set of (10-15) recommendation letters from the well known leaders of your field are usually used to establish this.
The EB1-OR (outstanding researcher) category requires that you be in a "researcher" position and your company employs at least 5 other researchers (I am assuming that you are not a tenure-track faculty member in a US institute of higher education). If this is true, then your employer simply needs to "sponsor" you by providing a support letter. No labor certification is needed; so employer need not bear any cost; you are allowed to pay for the whole process. You need to establish that you are an "outstanding researcher" with international reputation.
From what you have told us, it seems that EB2-NIW might be possible for you, but you very likely do not satisfy EB1-OR's requirements. In any case, there is a good amount of randomness in the process and hence there is always a possibility of getting approved. So if your employer does not want to spend any money and you can spare the money, then it may be worth a shot applying for an EB2-NIW. If you decide to do so, get a good lawyer, though.
more...
mrsr
03-04 10:01 PM
it says Yates memo not pearson memo :(
28 th page how ever says that Priority Date Based on Earlier Petition.
28 th page how ever says that Priority Date Based on Earlier Petition.
2010 dresses Best Disney Princess disney princesses funny faces.
kumar1
10-16 08:39 PM
bump
more...
gsc999
05-27 04:17 PM
House is currently controlled by the Republicans. If they do not pass the bill it would give the perception that the Bush admin. is ineffective. Bush's public rating have nose dived because of Iraq and now but if the bill doesn't pass it will show that he has no support in his own party. His core base is conservative Rep.
Also, it would be better for Republicans to pass the bill with some changes while they still control the house, once Dems gain House majority it may be too late for them to steer the passage of this bill with their amendments. This is a major issue, which I think will push them to pass this bill.
Bush will have to lean hard on some of the House Republicans to make this happen. He has publically commented on his intention of signing the bill by the end of the year.
These issues make me believe that House has to pass a bill. But again, politics is not logical.
Also, it would be better for Republicans to pass the bill with some changes while they still control the house, once Dems gain House majority it may be too late for them to steer the passage of this bill with their amendments. This is a major issue, which I think will push them to pass this bill.
Bush will have to lean hard on some of the House Republicans to make this happen. He has publically commented on his intention of signing the bill by the end of the year.
These issues make me believe that House has to pass a bill. But again, politics is not logical.
hair Disney princess songs with
urbaneagle
02-23 12:30 PM
I filed I-765 in January and got 1-year EAD last week. I called USCIS today and explained the error. It took a while to explain this to agent but he got it that this is a renewal application on the basis of pending I-485 without available visa number.
He filed service request for the error. As far as he knew, USCIS will send another EAD and send further instruction about 1-year EAD.
I filed EAD/AP together but the EAD I got is not a "Combo Card" (USCIS Term for combined EAD/AP)
I shall keep you posted.
He filed service request for the error. As far as he knew, USCIS will send another EAD and send further instruction about 1-year EAD.
I filed EAD/AP together but the EAD I got is not a "Combo Card" (USCIS Term for combined EAD/AP)
I shall keep you posted.
more...
485Mbe4001
04-06 03:34 PM
interesting that you created an account just to post this...
HOUSTON: A federal jury has found five people guilty of conspiring to obtain fraudulent work visas for nearly 90 Indian nationals in exchange for at
least $20,000 per visa, the US Attorney's Office said.
Mahendrakumar "Mack" Patel, 55, Rakesh Patel, 36, Alberto Pena, 38, Bernardo Pena, 38, and Marte Othon Villar Sr, 48, encouraged and induced the illegal immigration of Indian nationals in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars per visa, a statement from the US Attorney's Office said yesterday.
The jury found that Alberto and Bernardo Pena, twin brothers from Brownsville, along with co-defendants had encouraged and induced 87 individuals from Gujarat to unlawfully enter US on temporary H-2B visas, knowing that the Indian nationals did not intend to work for the company that was used to get visas for them.
The brothers also knew that the visa-seekers did not intend to return to India when their 10-month visas expired, a statement said.
Pena twins also travelled to India to assist the Indian nationals with the application process and visited and corresponded with the US Consulate in Mumbai.
Two other co-defendants -- Mack Patel of Ft Worth and Rakesh Patel, a Houston pharmacist -- pleaded guilty for recruiting Indian citizens who were willing to pay $20,000 to $60,000 in exchange for visas to enter the United States
Link : http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4359174.cms
HOUSTON: A federal jury has found five people guilty of conspiring to obtain fraudulent work visas for nearly 90 Indian nationals in exchange for at
least $20,000 per visa, the US Attorney's Office said.
Mahendrakumar "Mack" Patel, 55, Rakesh Patel, 36, Alberto Pena, 38, Bernardo Pena, 38, and Marte Othon Villar Sr, 48, encouraged and induced the illegal immigration of Indian nationals in exchange for tens of thousands of dollars per visa, a statement from the US Attorney's Office said yesterday.
The jury found that Alberto and Bernardo Pena, twin brothers from Brownsville, along with co-defendants had encouraged and induced 87 individuals from Gujarat to unlawfully enter US on temporary H-2B visas, knowing that the Indian nationals did not intend to work for the company that was used to get visas for them.
The brothers also knew that the visa-seekers did not intend to return to India when their 10-month visas expired, a statement said.
Pena twins also travelled to India to assist the Indian nationals with the application process and visited and corresponded with the US Consulate in Mumbai.
Two other co-defendants -- Mack Patel of Ft Worth and Rakesh Patel, a Houston pharmacist -- pleaded guilty for recruiting Indian citizens who were willing to pay $20,000 to $60,000 in exchange for visas to enter the United States
Link : http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4359174.cms
hot Disney Princesses aren#39;t all
gimme_GC2006
01-07 12:27 PM
Of Satyam's reported cash and bank balances of 53.61 billion rupees on Sept. 30, 50.4 billion rupees was non-existent, Raju said in the letter sent to the Bombay Stock Exchange.
oh..is that true..
I tired to read economic times and couldnt understand how much they cooked.
sucha big scam..employees will be on the edge now
oh..is that true..
I tired to read economic times and couldnt understand how much they cooked.
sucha big scam..employees will be on the edge now
more...
house Disney Princesses Funny Faces.
gcseeker2002
02-11 12:09 PM
EAD is like plate meals. GC is like full meals.:D
Full meals is not recommended by any doctor, plate meal is the best way to be healthy :)
So in other words GC will make you lazy and EAD keeps you working hard.
Full meals is not recommended by any doctor, plate meal is the best way to be healthy :)
So in other words GC will make you lazy and EAD keeps you working hard.
tattoo wallpaper Childrens Gifts cheap disney princesses funny faces. the Disney
javadeveloper
03-09 04:24 PM
Thanks for responding.I thought it's easy in India as we can directly go to passport office & get it in a day.
more...
pictures Disney Princess digital
siravi
11-20 04:40 PM
Dear IV Members,
Any one interested in participating in making Movie/Documentary please let me know.
..... movie/documentary on what/subject?
Any one interested in participating in making Movie/Documentary please let me know.
..... movie/documentary on what/subject?
dresses (the princesses making funny
pd052009
03-31 11:57 AM
Done
more...
makeup hairstyles disney princesses
urbaneagle
02-23 12:30 PM
I filed I-765 in January and got 1-year EAD last week. I called USCIS today and explained the error. It took a while to explain this to agent but he got it that this is a renewal application on the basis of pending I-485 without available visa number.
He filed service request for the error. As far as he knew, USCIS will send another EAD and send further instruction about 1-year EAD.
I filed EAD/AP together but the EAD I got is not a "Combo Card" (USCIS Term for combined EAD/AP)
I shall keep you posted.
He filed service request for the error. As far as he knew, USCIS will send another EAD and send further instruction about 1-year EAD.
I filed EAD/AP together but the EAD I got is not a "Combo Card" (USCIS Term for combined EAD/AP)
I shall keep you posted.
girlfriend dresses dresses pink Disney Princess funny disney princess pictures.
immigrant
05-24 12:54 PM
Hope it has an impact
hairstyles funny disney princess
EndlessWait
02-07 11:31 AM
and still waiting
crazy_apple
07-14 08:24 PM
Hello,
I am sure others might have noticed that 485 processing dates at NSC (for example) have literally crawled from the beginning of the year to now. Here are the processing dates (per USCIS status).
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
12/15/2007 Status - 04/24/2007
01/15/2008 - 07/19/2007
06/15/2008 - 07/28/2007
Thats roughly 9/10 days worth of 485 processing from mid-Jan to mid-Jun 2008. I wonder what the processing date looks like for the mid-July status update (which should probably be out tomorrow).
I am sure others might have noticed that 485 processing dates at NSC (for example) have literally crawled from the beginning of the year to now. Here are the processing dates (per USCIS status).
https://egov.uscis.gov/cris/jsps/Processtimes.jsp?SeviceCenter=NSC
12/15/2007 Status - 04/24/2007
01/15/2008 - 07/19/2007
06/15/2008 - 07/28/2007
Thats roughly 9/10 days worth of 485 processing from mid-Jan to mid-Jun 2008. I wonder what the processing date looks like for the mid-July status update (which should probably be out tomorrow).
sstalib
05-26 01:45 PM
House Republican (Representative F. James Sensenbrenner) Pessimistic on Immigration Deal (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/05/26/washington/26cnd-immig.html)
After reading the comparisons and statements from House leaders, this bill may languish for a few months before becoming law. STILL I HOLD MY HOPES UP.
After reading the comparisons and statements from House leaders, this bill may languish for a few months before becoming law. STILL I HOLD MY HOPES UP.
No comments:
Post a Comment