puddonhead
06-18 12:34 PM
Translation: Since my job is not impacted by this issue, I am not interested in reporting this fraud. I will wait, until my job gets affected.
Is that you have in mind, Mr. PuttonHead
.
Well - thanks for your mind reading services! However, I am not sure that is what I implied.
From 2004 I did not report the fraud since I did not know about it. Right now - I wont report it since I dont want to create disruption in this environment - disruption that can come back to bite me. A year down the line - when the environment and the economy is a little better - you bet I will report it now that I know about it.
Is that you have in mind, Mr. PuttonHead
.
Well - thanks for your mind reading services! However, I am not sure that is what I implied.
From 2004 I did not report the fraud since I did not know about it. Right now - I wont report it since I dont want to create disruption in this environment - disruption that can come back to bite me. A year down the line - when the environment and the economy is a little better - you bet I will report it now that I know about it.
wallpaper target store interior. hair
Hunter
05-09 02:02 PM
You want to talk about skills .. Huh?
Lets start with Madoff ...... :D:D:D:D
You can take him and keep him in a cell with Satyam Raju. I don't care.
How pathetic, you don't even have a response for the "skills" practiced by H1/L1/Indian offshroe companies/fly-by-night operators!!
Lets start with Madoff ...... :D:D:D:D
You can take him and keep him in a cell with Satyam Raju. I don't care.
How pathetic, you don't even have a response for the "skills" practiced by H1/L1/Indian offshroe companies/fly-by-night operators!!
bskrishna
09-12 01:02 PM
We should call our local congressmen and women as well so that they are aware of this. If the bill comes to the floor it will be useful.
2011 dresses 2011 new Target store
h1techSlave
03-26 10:20 AM
As I see it, not hiring the best qualified person (irrespective of his status) is does not make much financial sense.
Don't you think it is an aspect of socialism to give protection to American citizens, even when they are not the best suitable person for the job?
That suit will not stand a chance, not becasue it doesn't have legal merit but because it goes to the core of capitalistic system.
Don't you think it is an aspect of socialism to give protection to American citizens, even when they are not the best suitable person for the job?
That suit will not stand a chance, not becasue it doesn't have legal merit but because it goes to the core of capitalistic system.
more...
waitnwatch
08-21 12:46 PM
If all these years they were misinterpreting the law, where were lawyers and AILA raising their voice to correct this mistake? This error was deeply affecting the clients of lawyers.
We need to see more proactive activism of lawyers in matters such as these that are very important for the community. If not, members need to learn the law and do such research themselves. IV core team has been trying its best to read the law and create presentations and research documents whenever we have an important action item or bill on the floor. I would urge the community to read the law om their own as and when needed and raise their awareness.
You are right about members working on understanding the law in this forum and thrashing out arguments to make them fool proof. Instead I find people getting incensed at each other and creating a destructive environment instead of a constructive one.
As far as immigration lawyers go - they have no incentive to file a lawsuit to get a correct interpretation as they donot stand to gain whatever way the law is interpreted. Also while there definitely are a few smart immigration lawyers- the run of the mill ones are no better than paralegals. I'm not sure I should be saying the above but my experience points to that.
We need to see more proactive activism of lawyers in matters such as these that are very important for the community. If not, members need to learn the law and do such research themselves. IV core team has been trying its best to read the law and create presentations and research documents whenever we have an important action item or bill on the floor. I would urge the community to read the law om their own as and when needed and raise their awareness.
You are right about members working on understanding the law in this forum and thrashing out arguments to make them fool proof. Instead I find people getting incensed at each other and creating a destructive environment instead of a constructive one.
As far as immigration lawyers go - they have no incentive to file a lawsuit to get a correct interpretation as they donot stand to gain whatever way the law is interpreted. Also while there definitely are a few smart immigration lawyers- the run of the mill ones are no better than paralegals. I'm not sure I should be saying the above but my experience points to that.
logiclife
01-07 03:07 PM
House Majority leader Tom Delay has resigned and will not seek the Majority post until next year. See here:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010700488.html
The house republicans will move to start working on electing a new house majority leader. Tom Delay was considered to be anti-immigration that tightened immigration laws according to anti-immigration organizations like www.numbersusa.com. He voted in favor of HR 4437 that is a nightmare for illegal immigration but does not address the ones already here illegally. And no, there is no mention of legal immigration facing backlogs in this bill either. Just enforcement to crackdown on illegal immigration. Voting "Yes" by any congressman on HR 4437 should not be construed as either supporting or opposing the legal immigration and/or retrogression relief.
There are 3 house members likely to seek the position and replace Tom Delay:
1. Roy Blunt (Missouri's 7th District). http://www.blunt.house.gov/
Roy Blunt has gotten poor grades from Anti-immigration orgs. However he voted to support HR 4437 that deals will illegal immigration. His views on legal immigration are unpredictable at best.
2. John Boehner (Ohio's 8th District). http://johnboehner.house.gov/
John Boehner has scored poor grades like Roy Blunt on immigration issues from Anti-immigration sites. However he too has voted to support HR 4437. His views on legal kind of immigration are again unknown at best.
3. Jeff Flake (Arizona's 6th District). http://www.house.gov/flake/
This is interesting. Jeff Flake is considered against immigration by Anti-immigration orgs. He got 100% marks by their grading system (God only knows how that grading system works on numbersusa.com, but whatever). He also voted to support HR 4437.
However he has co-sponsored a bill along with Ted Kennedy, Joe Lieberman, Sam Brownback, Jim Kolbe etc that deals comprehensively with immigration problem in this country, both the legal and the illegal variety. See that here: http://kennedy.senate.gov/~kennedy/statements/05/05/2005512A04.html
Title VI describes proposals for retrogression relief.:) :)
Jeff Flake is one of the saner and more pragmatic voices in immigration debate. While he wants to crackdown on the illegal variety, he also understands the other reform need in other areas of immigration.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/01/07/AR2006010700488.html
The house republicans will move to start working on electing a new house majority leader. Tom Delay was considered to be anti-immigration that tightened immigration laws according to anti-immigration organizations like www.numbersusa.com. He voted in favor of HR 4437 that is a nightmare for illegal immigration but does not address the ones already here illegally. And no, there is no mention of legal immigration facing backlogs in this bill either. Just enforcement to crackdown on illegal immigration. Voting "Yes" by any congressman on HR 4437 should not be construed as either supporting or opposing the legal immigration and/or retrogression relief.
There are 3 house members likely to seek the position and replace Tom Delay:
1. Roy Blunt (Missouri's 7th District). http://www.blunt.house.gov/
Roy Blunt has gotten poor grades from Anti-immigration orgs. However he voted to support HR 4437 that deals will illegal immigration. His views on legal immigration are unpredictable at best.
2. John Boehner (Ohio's 8th District). http://johnboehner.house.gov/
John Boehner has scored poor grades like Roy Blunt on immigration issues from Anti-immigration sites. However he too has voted to support HR 4437. His views on legal kind of immigration are again unknown at best.
3. Jeff Flake (Arizona's 6th District). http://www.house.gov/flake/
This is interesting. Jeff Flake is considered against immigration by Anti-immigration orgs. He got 100% marks by their grading system (God only knows how that grading system works on numbersusa.com, but whatever). He also voted to support HR 4437.
However he has co-sponsored a bill along with Ted Kennedy, Joe Lieberman, Sam Brownback, Jim Kolbe etc that deals comprehensively with immigration problem in this country, both the legal and the illegal variety. See that here: http://kennedy.senate.gov/~kennedy/statements/05/05/2005512A04.html
Title VI describes proposals for retrogression relief.:) :)
Jeff Flake is one of the saner and more pragmatic voices in immigration debate. While he wants to crackdown on the illegal variety, he also understands the other reform need in other areas of immigration.
more...
bmoni
09-14 06:29 PM
Jungalee,
Excellent draft. Do we have list of all the email addresses of house committee
I couldn't find it online all i could find is https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
If anyone could find or direct us to a link for all the email addresses that could be great. Lets do a email campaign in parallel with calling.
Excellent draft. Do we have list of all the email addresses of house committee
I couldn't find it online all i could find is https://forms.house.gov/wyr/welcome.shtml
If anyone could find or direct us to a link for all the email addresses that could be great. Lets do a email campaign in parallel with calling.
2010 Interior of Humphry Slocombe
drirshad
01-09 01:43 PM
DOW has crossed the 11,000 mark that is good for the economy .......
more...
caliguy
10-06 01:11 AM
@ SOP
Can you please provide me the sequence to call TSC using the POJ method? Based on what I read earlier in another thread, it was mentioned to choose option 4 which is to reports cases that were seperated. I tried that, reached an IO. IO told me that I should not be calling that number to check the status of my case. Do I need to choose another option?
Thanks!
Caliguy,
POJ method can be used for all cases that are current and in the processing window...just keep on trying ur luck and I am sure you'll land a decent CSR who will be much much more useful and worth your trials and efforts.
Be persistent and you have every right to be after all you came this far.
Write to Janet Napolitano and mention that you are unfairly getting delayed and that you want to know what is holding your application and all checks and clearances done and visa number is available...
SoP
Can you please provide me the sequence to call TSC using the POJ method? Based on what I read earlier in another thread, it was mentioned to choose option 4 which is to reports cases that were seperated. I tried that, reached an IO. IO told me that I should not be calling that number to check the status of my case. Do I need to choose another option?
Thanks!
Caliguy,
POJ method can be used for all cases that are current and in the processing window...just keep on trying ur luck and I am sure you'll land a decent CSR who will be much much more useful and worth your trials and efforts.
Be persistent and you have every right to be after all you came this far.
Write to Janet Napolitano and mention that you are unfairly getting delayed and that you want to know what is holding your application and all checks and clearances done and visa number is available...
SoP
hair Store Interior Branding
rajuseattle
04-06 12:23 AM
GC_info:
YOU can apply her AP with the instructions to deliver the AP to nearby US consulate in India. Upon AP approval, she can go and collect her AP from the consulate and come back using AP.
YOU can apply her AP with the instructions to deliver the AP to nearby US consulate in India. Upon AP approval, she can go and collect her AP from the consulate and come back using AP.
more...
smitha
07-09 08:48 PM
Thanks for the comments...I'll personally come and see you off at the airport when you are ready to leave. I gusess you have your bags packed already.
Just so you know we are not begging for GC we've earned it.
But do you think that by constantly irritating USCIS, all dates of 2005-06-07 guys will be current again?
Just so you know we are not begging for GC we've earned it.
But do you think that by constantly irritating USCIS, all dates of 2005-06-07 guys will be current again?
hot the nearby interior store.
drona
07-09 06:39 PM
The flowers must go to USCIS. Let them forward it to the hospital. We need them to go to USCIS to make the media story. I don't think they can intervene our orders.
more...
house Target store in Kennewick,
sgsg
01-30 05:56 AM
It is WAC and was approved in Mar 2007. My earlier two H1 petitions were from EAC. I have two H1 transfers in my H1 history.
I guess the cases with transfer and extensions are getting delayed.
I guess the cases with transfer and extensions are getting delayed.
tattoo tattoo of Target store plan
desi3933
06-18 12:06 PM
.... If they can't find a guy, most companies now a days are putting off projects and wait. So your campaign on this scale will not help H1Bs at all. ...
>> If they can't find a guy ....
Total BS. Do you know how the market is. We have 2 open positions (dot net developers) that I am trying to fill up. We have got over 200 resumes in less than a week.
So many consulting companies are offering H1-B resources at 40 to 50 dollars per hour.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
>> If they can't find a guy ....
Total BS. Do you know how the market is. We have 2 open positions (dot net developers) that I am trying to fill up. We have got over 200 resumes in less than a week.
So many consulting companies are offering H1-B resources at 40 to 50 dollars per hour.
Wake up and smell the coffee.
more...
pictures target store interior. tattoo
desi3933
06-18 11:43 AM
No - I am not suggesting that!!
Good to know that.
What I am suggesting is that the right time to take this up is when a recession is not in full swing. Between 2004 (when this law was enacted) and 2007 was a great time to pick this battle. Maybe another year down the line would also be a great time to pick it. Picking up this particular battle right now would probably make YOUR and MY lives much more difficult in the medium term.
I disagree. By not reporting the fraud at workplace, it puts rest of workforce not at level playing field.
Like you and the OP - I am a selfish individual. I will pick up only those fights which are in my interest. I believe that this particular fight is a lose-lose proposition in the current climate. I am disputing your (and OPs) belief that this will be beneficial for you/me/rest of us.
Lets take the example of the same Goldman Sachs manager. Tomorrow ICE comes to him and says you need to get rid of these 50 guys under you. What will he do? He cant increase the budget in the current environment. So he probably will hire a couple of GC holders/Citizens and replaces the whole division (with 50 GC/Citizens besides the 50 'violators') with an offshore team.
You are right. If you are not impacted by fraud, one will be least interested in reporting the fraud. Only when you get impacted, the fraud appears real and serious.
To give you example, There are only 3 people on H-1B at my workplace and none on L1 visa status, so no one cares here about this issue.
BTW - I am a US citizen of Indian origin.
Think about it!!
Now is the time when everybody is thinking in terms of cost cutting. If you create costly disruptions now - then either the company becomes GM and lose out to overseas competitors or migrates the entire division out.
Taking your example further, due to budget constraints, the manager will be more inclined to replace workers to L1 workers to save cost. Do you want this? This will impact people in short term.
.
Good to know that.
What I am suggesting is that the right time to take this up is when a recession is not in full swing. Between 2004 (when this law was enacted) and 2007 was a great time to pick this battle. Maybe another year down the line would also be a great time to pick it. Picking up this particular battle right now would probably make YOUR and MY lives much more difficult in the medium term.
I disagree. By not reporting the fraud at workplace, it puts rest of workforce not at level playing field.
Like you and the OP - I am a selfish individual. I will pick up only those fights which are in my interest. I believe that this particular fight is a lose-lose proposition in the current climate. I am disputing your (and OPs) belief that this will be beneficial for you/me/rest of us.
Lets take the example of the same Goldman Sachs manager. Tomorrow ICE comes to him and says you need to get rid of these 50 guys under you. What will he do? He cant increase the budget in the current environment. So he probably will hire a couple of GC holders/Citizens and replaces the whole division (with 50 GC/Citizens besides the 50 'violators') with an offshore team.
You are right. If you are not impacted by fraud, one will be least interested in reporting the fraud. Only when you get impacted, the fraud appears real and serious.
To give you example, There are only 3 people on H-1B at my workplace and none on L1 visa status, so no one cares here about this issue.
BTW - I am a US citizen of Indian origin.
Think about it!!
Now is the time when everybody is thinking in terms of cost cutting. If you create costly disruptions now - then either the company becomes GM and lose out to overseas competitors or migrates the entire division out.
Taking your example further, due to budget constraints, the manager will be more inclined to replace workers to L1 workers to save cost. Do you want this? This will impact people in short term.
.
dresses Target Stores Burst with
mallu
09-29 10:48 AM
From Ireland.
more...
makeup This guy is a Target store
bkn96
11-25 10:52 PM
Ron Gotcher Latest ' ImmInfo Newsletter' states clearly 485 denial is illegal
***********
CIS issuing illegal AOS denials based on I-140 revocations
Recently, the CIS has been issuing denials ofadjustment of status applications in cases where the applicant has an approved I-140, and an AOS application pending for more than 180 days, but the petitioning employer has attempted to revoke the approved I-140.
These denials are patently illegal. They violate both CIS policy and statutory law. Both statutory law and explicit CIS policy are clear on this subject: An employer may not revoke an approved I-140 petition after an adjustment of status application has
been pending for at least 180 days. While we have not seen denials of any of our cases, we have seen a number of such denials by applicants who have contacted our office to assist them with filing motions to reconsider. It is shocking that the CIS
continues to issue denials even after the first MTRs were submitted. They are issuing these denials with full knowledge that there is no legal basis for what they are doing and that their actions violate existing law.
Anyone who receives such a denial must file a motion to reconsider immediately. The CIS has said that they are processing MTRs within 60 days. If the MTR does not result in a reversal of the denial within 60 days, the applicant should proceed in US District Court immediately to see a reversal. Immediate action is necessary to prevent the accumulation of unlawful presence following the denial.
***********
CIS issuing illegal AOS denials based on I-140 revocations
Recently, the CIS has been issuing denials ofadjustment of status applications in cases where the applicant has an approved I-140, and an AOS application pending for more than 180 days, but the petitioning employer has attempted to revoke the approved I-140.
These denials are patently illegal. They violate both CIS policy and statutory law. Both statutory law and explicit CIS policy are clear on this subject: An employer may not revoke an approved I-140 petition after an adjustment of status application has
been pending for at least 180 days. While we have not seen denials of any of our cases, we have seen a number of such denials by applicants who have contacted our office to assist them with filing motions to reconsider. It is shocking that the CIS
continues to issue denials even after the first MTRs were submitted. They are issuing these denials with full knowledge that there is no legal basis for what they are doing and that their actions violate existing law.
Anyone who receives such a denial must file a motion to reconsider immediately. The CIS has said that they are processing MTRs within 60 days. If the MTR does not result in a reversal of the denial within 60 days, the applicant should proceed in US District Court immediately to see a reversal. Immediate action is necessary to prevent the accumulation of unlawful presence following the denial.
girlfriend products for Target stores
gc28262
10-05 02:00 PM
When I call through vonage phone, the wireless internet connection to other computers is getting lost. Is this the problem others have too?
Is it having another router in between your vonage phone and cable /DSL connection solve the problem?
Any thoughts? Has anyone inquired this with vonage folks?
Vonage won't affect any wireless connections.
Do you use a cordless phone ?
The wireless transmission from your cordless phone maybe affecting the transmissions from your wireless router.
Is it having another router in between your vonage phone and cable /DSL connection solve the problem?
Any thoughts? Has anyone inquired this with vonage folks?
Vonage won't affect any wireless connections.
Do you use a cordless phone ?
The wireless transmission from your cordless phone maybe affecting the transmissions from your wireless router.
hairstyles Store Interior Branding
chanduv23
07-10 09:48 PM
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070710/pl_nm/usa_immigration_indians_dc_1
Rate it high - try getting as many hist as possible so that it stays on top
Rate it high - try getting as many hist as possible so that it stays on top
ArunAntonio
07-09 06:41 PM
I feel really happy, for once USCIS acknowledged our efforts and also the end results is really good because the injured will recieve flowers from some one they will never meet.
There is strength in the ways of GandhiJi.
There is strength in the ways of GandhiJi.
Milind123
01-24 02:57 PM
It is not good disparaging the countries needing TV by calling them idiotic and asking for boycott etc. Please know that you are living in a country (USA) which is far worse than those "idiotic" countries in this respect since 2003. US needs C1 visa for transiting through its airports even when you have a valid VISA stamp in your passport to a destination country and you need to fill eqaully gruelling application (DS 156). Also you need to carry documents for travel purposes and financial support.
Which form is more gruelling, you folks decide. Here are the 111 questions you need to answers to get a Transit Visa. I centainly find some of the question totally nosy and irrelevant esp. for a DTV. The last question is interesting. I was so so tempted to write FU for an answer.
Application for United Kingdom Entry Clearance
Applicant Name:
Visa Type: Visit
Visa Sub-Type: Direct Airside Transit
Visa Fee: USD 276.00
Postage Fee: USD 0.00
Submission Method:
Issuing Office: British Consulate General New York
Payment Made: Yes - Online
Form: VAF6
Section 1 - About You
1 Given name
2 Family name
3 Other names
4 Gender
5 Date of birth
6 Place of birth
7 Country of birth
8 Nationality
9 Do you hold any other nationalities?
10 What is your marital status?
Section 2 - Passport Information
11 Current passport or travel document number
12 Place of issue
13 Issuing authority
14 Date of issue
15 Date of expiry
16 Is this your first passport
17 You stated that you have got a previous passport.
Passport or travel document number(if known)
18 Place of issue (if known)
19 Where is this passport
Section 3 - Your Contact Details
20 Apt/Floor/Suite/Room/Street
21 City/Town/Village/Suburb/State/Province(where applicable)
22 Select the Country in which you live
23 Postal Code/Zip Code
24 How long have you lived at this address?
25 Home (landline) telephone number
26 Mobile telephone number
27 Will this be your contact details during the application process?
Section 4 - Your Family (Spouse, Partner, Civil Partner)
28 Spouse/partner's given name
29 Spouse/partner's family name
30 Where is your spouse/partner now
31 Spouse/partner's date of birth
32 Spouse/partner's nationality
33 Will your spouse/partner be travelling with you?
Section 4 - Your Family
34 Do you have any children Yes
35 How many children do you have?
Section 4 - Your Family (child 1)
36 Child's given name
37 Child's family name
38 Child's date of birth
39 Child's place of birth
40 Relationship to you
41 Child's Nationality
42 Please indicate whether they are travelling with you
43 Child's address details
44 Child's passport number
Section 4 - Your Family (child 2)
45 Child's given name
46 Child's family name
47 Child's date of birth
48 Child's place of birth
49 Relationship to you
50 Child's nationality
51 Please indicate whether they are travelling with you
52 Child's address details
Section 4 - Your Family
53 Will any other children be travelling with you?
Section 4 - Your Family (Father)
54 Father's given name
55 Father's family name
56 Father's date of birth
57 Father's place and country of birth
58 Father's nationality/nationalities
Section 4 - Your Family(Mother)
59 Mother's given name
60 Mother's family name
61 Mother's date of birth
62 Mother's place and country of birth
63 Mother's nationality/nationalities
Section 5 - Immigration History
64 Have you ever travelled outside your country or residence� in the last 10 years?
65 Have you ever travelled to the UK� in the last 10 years?
66 Have you ever been refused a visa for the UK?
67 Have you ever been refused a visa for any country?
68 Have you been granted a UK visa in the last 10 years?
69 Have you been refused entry on arrival to the UK in the last 10 years?
70 Have you ever been deported� removed or otherwise required to leave the UK?
71 Have you ever been deported� removed or otherwise required to leave another country?
72 Have you made an application to the Home Office to remain in the UK in the last 10 years?
73 Do you have a UK National Insurance Number?
74 Do you have any criminal convictions in any country (including traffic offences)?
75 Have you ever been charged in any country with a criminal offence for which you have not yet been tried in the court (including traffic offences)?
76 In times of either peace or war have you� ever been involved in� or suspected of involvement in� war crimes� crimes against humanity or genocide?
77 Have you ever been involved in� supported� or encouraged terrorist activities in any country? Have you� ever been a member of� or given support to an organisation that has been concerned in terrorism?
78 Have you ever� by any means or medium� expressed views that justify or glorify terrorist violence or that may encourage others to terrorist acts or other serious criminal acts?
79 Have you engaged in any other activities that might indicate that you may not be considered a person of good character?
80 You stated that you had travelled outside your country.
Please give the approximate date and duration and purpose of your stay/s
81 You stated that you had travelled to the UK.
Please give the approximate date and duration and purpose of your stay
Section 6 - Travel Plans
82 Why are you travelling through the UK?
83 Which country are you travelling to through the UK?
84 Which country is your final destination?
85 Why are you going to the above country?
86 Do you have a visa or residence permit for your destination once you leave the UK?
87 Have you confirmed your travel plans to and from of the UK?
88 You stated that you have confirmed your travel plans.
Please provide details
Section 6 - Travel Plans(Outward Bound)
89 Date of arrival in the UK
90 At which UK airport will you land
91 Flight number
92 Date of departure from the UK.
You must depart the same day that you arrive.
93 From which UK airport will you leave the UK.
You must depart from the same airport that you arrived.
94 Flight number
Section 6 - Travel Plans(Inward Bound)
95 Will you travel through the UK on your return?
Section 6 - Current Finances and Employment
96 Are you unemployed� employed� or self-employed?
97 You stated that you are employed/self employed.
What is your present job or occupation?
98 What is the name of the company you work for?
99 When did you start this job?
100 Please provide your work address details
101 What are your employer's telephone numbers?
Landline telephone number
102 Mobile telephone number
103 What is your employer's e-mail address?
104 Do you have any other source of income from a second job or occupation?
105 Your total monthly income from all sources of work or employment after tax
Section 6 - Current Employment and Finances
106 Do you receive income from any other sources� including friends or family?
107 Do you have savings� properties or other income� for example� from stocks and shares?
108 You stated that you have savings� property or income.
Please give details
109 If someone other than yourself is paying for all or any part of this visit� how much will they give you?
110 What is the cost to you personally� of this trip?
Section 7 - Additional Information
111 Is there any other information you wish to be considered as part of your application?
Data Protection Statement
I understand that all information provided by me will be processed by UKvisas in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 and for the purposes of processing my visa application. I am aware that UKvisas blah... blah... blah... (Edited)
I am aware that all information provided by me will be treated in confidence but it may be disclosed to other government departments, agencies, blah... blah... blah... (Edited)
Declaration
You must now read the declaration below and sign it. This must be signed by the applicant personally and not by a representative or other person acting on his/her behalf. An application for a person under the age of 18 may be completed by the parent or legal guardian.
blah... blah... blah... (Edited)
Applicant's Signature:
Date Signed:
For Office Use Only
Online Payment Details
Amount Paid USD 276.00
Auth Code
Date Paid
Issue / Refuse :
Category Visit
Type Direct Airside Transit
Code
Check 1
Check 2
Date Effective
Date of Expiry
Police Registration Yes / No
Tier
ECO Time taken
Authorising ECO
EC Number
Issued Date
Which form is more gruelling, you folks decide. Here are the 111 questions you need to answers to get a Transit Visa. I centainly find some of the question totally nosy and irrelevant esp. for a DTV. The last question is interesting. I was so so tempted to write FU for an answer.
Application for United Kingdom Entry Clearance
Applicant Name:
Visa Type: Visit
Visa Sub-Type: Direct Airside Transit
Visa Fee: USD 276.00
Postage Fee: USD 0.00
Submission Method:
Issuing Office: British Consulate General New York
Payment Made: Yes - Online
Form: VAF6
Section 1 - About You
1 Given name
2 Family name
3 Other names
4 Gender
5 Date of birth
6 Place of birth
7 Country of birth
8 Nationality
9 Do you hold any other nationalities?
10 What is your marital status?
Section 2 - Passport Information
11 Current passport or travel document number
12 Place of issue
13 Issuing authority
14 Date of issue
15 Date of expiry
16 Is this your first passport
17 You stated that you have got a previous passport.
Passport or travel document number(if known)
18 Place of issue (if known)
19 Where is this passport
Section 3 - Your Contact Details
20 Apt/Floor/Suite/Room/Street
21 City/Town/Village/Suburb/State/Province(where applicable)
22 Select the Country in which you live
23 Postal Code/Zip Code
24 How long have you lived at this address?
25 Home (landline) telephone number
26 Mobile telephone number
27 Will this be your contact details during the application process?
Section 4 - Your Family (Spouse, Partner, Civil Partner)
28 Spouse/partner's given name
29 Spouse/partner's family name
30 Where is your spouse/partner now
31 Spouse/partner's date of birth
32 Spouse/partner's nationality
33 Will your spouse/partner be travelling with you?
Section 4 - Your Family
34 Do you have any children Yes
35 How many children do you have?
Section 4 - Your Family (child 1)
36 Child's given name
37 Child's family name
38 Child's date of birth
39 Child's place of birth
40 Relationship to you
41 Child's Nationality
42 Please indicate whether they are travelling with you
43 Child's address details
44 Child's passport number
Section 4 - Your Family (child 2)
45 Child's given name
46 Child's family name
47 Child's date of birth
48 Child's place of birth
49 Relationship to you
50 Child's nationality
51 Please indicate whether they are travelling with you
52 Child's address details
Section 4 - Your Family
53 Will any other children be travelling with you?
Section 4 - Your Family (Father)
54 Father's given name
55 Father's family name
56 Father's date of birth
57 Father's place and country of birth
58 Father's nationality/nationalities
Section 4 - Your Family(Mother)
59 Mother's given name
60 Mother's family name
61 Mother's date of birth
62 Mother's place and country of birth
63 Mother's nationality/nationalities
Section 5 - Immigration History
64 Have you ever travelled outside your country or residence� in the last 10 years?
65 Have you ever travelled to the UK� in the last 10 years?
66 Have you ever been refused a visa for the UK?
67 Have you ever been refused a visa for any country?
68 Have you been granted a UK visa in the last 10 years?
69 Have you been refused entry on arrival to the UK in the last 10 years?
70 Have you ever been deported� removed or otherwise required to leave the UK?
71 Have you ever been deported� removed or otherwise required to leave another country?
72 Have you made an application to the Home Office to remain in the UK in the last 10 years?
73 Do you have a UK National Insurance Number?
74 Do you have any criminal convictions in any country (including traffic offences)?
75 Have you ever been charged in any country with a criminal offence for which you have not yet been tried in the court (including traffic offences)?
76 In times of either peace or war have you� ever been involved in� or suspected of involvement in� war crimes� crimes against humanity or genocide?
77 Have you ever been involved in� supported� or encouraged terrorist activities in any country? Have you� ever been a member of� or given support to an organisation that has been concerned in terrorism?
78 Have you ever� by any means or medium� expressed views that justify or glorify terrorist violence or that may encourage others to terrorist acts or other serious criminal acts?
79 Have you engaged in any other activities that might indicate that you may not be considered a person of good character?
80 You stated that you had travelled outside your country.
Please give the approximate date and duration and purpose of your stay/s
81 You stated that you had travelled to the UK.
Please give the approximate date and duration and purpose of your stay
Section 6 - Travel Plans
82 Why are you travelling through the UK?
83 Which country are you travelling to through the UK?
84 Which country is your final destination?
85 Why are you going to the above country?
86 Do you have a visa or residence permit for your destination once you leave the UK?
87 Have you confirmed your travel plans to and from of the UK?
88 You stated that you have confirmed your travel plans.
Please provide details
Section 6 - Travel Plans(Outward Bound)
89 Date of arrival in the UK
90 At which UK airport will you land
91 Flight number
92 Date of departure from the UK.
You must depart the same day that you arrive.
93 From which UK airport will you leave the UK.
You must depart from the same airport that you arrived.
94 Flight number
Section 6 - Travel Plans(Inward Bound)
95 Will you travel through the UK on your return?
Section 6 - Current Finances and Employment
96 Are you unemployed� employed� or self-employed?
97 You stated that you are employed/self employed.
What is your present job or occupation?
98 What is the name of the company you work for?
99 When did you start this job?
100 Please provide your work address details
101 What are your employer's telephone numbers?
Landline telephone number
102 Mobile telephone number
103 What is your employer's e-mail address?
104 Do you have any other source of income from a second job or occupation?
105 Your total monthly income from all sources of work or employment after tax
Section 6 - Current Employment and Finances
106 Do you receive income from any other sources� including friends or family?
107 Do you have savings� properties or other income� for example� from stocks and shares?
108 You stated that you have savings� property or income.
Please give details
109 If someone other than yourself is paying for all or any part of this visit� how much will they give you?
110 What is the cost to you personally� of this trip?
Section 7 - Additional Information
111 Is there any other information you wish to be considered as part of your application?
Data Protection Statement
I understand that all information provided by me will be processed by UKvisas in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 and for the purposes of processing my visa application. I am aware that UKvisas blah... blah... blah... (Edited)
I am aware that all information provided by me will be treated in confidence but it may be disclosed to other government departments, agencies, blah... blah... blah... (Edited)
Declaration
You must now read the declaration below and sign it. This must be signed by the applicant personally and not by a representative or other person acting on his/her behalf. An application for a person under the age of 18 may be completed by the parent or legal guardian.
blah... blah... blah... (Edited)
Applicant's Signature:
Date Signed:
For Office Use Only
Online Payment Details
Amount Paid USD 276.00
Auth Code
Date Paid
Issue / Refuse :
Category Visit
Type Direct Airside Transit
Code
Check 1
Check 2
Date Effective
Date of Expiry
Police Registration Yes / No
Tier
ECO Time taken
Authorising ECO
EC Number
Issued Date
No comments:
Post a Comment