Tuesday, July 5, 2011

images %IMG_DESC_8% . %IMG_DESC_1%
  • %IMG_DESC_1%



  • waiting4gc02
    05-15 12:24 PM
    Thanks for the reply..Sanju.

    Would you know if you were to use AC21 after 180 days of filing 485, to change employer what you would need..?

    Do you need to change H1-B ???

    Thanks





    wallpaper %IMG_DESC_1% . %IMG_DESC_2%
  • %IMG_DESC_2%



  • ganguteli
    06-10 01:27 PM
    I am also from India but the point I am discussing here is clearly a violation of law by Outsourcing vendors including IBM (not just Indian companies), TCS, Wipro etc. I work for a medium size consulting firm based in US and on H1 visa ...and I am impacted by these violations and I think I have the right to oppose this act.... to prove my identity shud I tell you my stories in Chennai consulate... or shud I tell u abt my days in b'lore or shud I tell you all abt my 24 years in India.. you can decide :-).

    BUT regarding the L1 violation we have decided and this time the vendor is exposed to the authorities and justice is done. We have the support of good client managers who understands visa regulations.

    Whatever Dude!

    I have heard that story before. Ask your bosses at losers guild to teach you better stories to blend in with us.
    If you are really sincere, why don't you send your name, phone number and employer name to IV and IV will put you in touch with the right people to complain?
    No point trying to hide your identity and faking your own convictions.





    . %IMG_DESC_3%
  • %IMG_DESC_3%



  • bestin
    03-24 09:46 AM
    Yes, it is for a job which does NOT require security clearance.

    Is there a formal way / method to let the company and USCIS know of such discrimination ? Any published guidelines from USCIS ?


    My wife works for TCS and is on vacation .We tried contacting the local office here .Though the guy mentioned that they have projects ,he still wants her to goto India and comeback on TCS visa and sent her a email that TCS policy doesntnot allow EAD holders.





    2011 %IMG_DESC_2% . %IMG_DESC_4%
  • %IMG_DESC_4%



  • amitjoey
    07-09 06:34 PM
    This is great news, it will definately make a good story.



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_5%
  • %IMG_DESC_5%



  • immi2006
    07-09 10:11 PM
    This they cannot send there.... they have to take this :D





    . %IMG_DESC_6%
  • %IMG_DESC_6%



  • SunnySurya
    08-07 11:46 AM
    Thanks for your red dots... May I ask, what do mean by becoming eligible?
    If they can file in Eb2 , shouldn't they stand in the end of line.

    Reason most people filed in EB3 was that it was thought that their application will be subjected to less scrutny and had higher chances of success. Also, so far EB3 has been moving in tandem with Eb2, so it did not matter.

    Dude. I am US educated & EB2....1st I didnt understand what u were calling people for.

    Man this is the story of the Indian crab in real life. If someone becomes eligible to interfile as EB2...why should you be against it?

    I am totally against ur proposal...and am giving u red dots ok.

    Sarve Jana sukhino bavanthu - Let everyone be content & happy.



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_7%
  • %IMG_DESC_7%



  • jsb
    09-25 03:51 PM
    Thanks. I did sent email and fax last week.

    What action do we expect on our letters/faxes to Congressmen, besides a routine reply USCIS is used to. This is not the first time that somebody is bothering them in their leizurely work. If they have tons of filings all over their offices, how do you expect them to find your case out of them.

    USCIS continue to say that they have loads and loads of filings yet to be entered.





    2010 %IMG_DESC_3% . %IMG_DESC_8%
  • %IMG_DESC_8%



  • smisachu
    07-09 11:15 PM
    We have no doubt that India is Great...Can't you see in this Gandhigiri that we are doing!! Show me any other country on earth that is using something that is more than 70 years old!!We are here(in US) to acheive some goal..higher than GC..but GC is an essential step in acheiving this..That's it..
    By the same tokes as you say, if Gandhi did not start Quit India movement citing that his efforts for the past 25 years have not suceeded so there is no chance now...British would not have left in 1947

    What we are protesting is the unnecessary turmoil that USCIS put us through..as you said we cannot force things in US like in India, so we have not called for a Bundh, we don't plan to burn anything or pelt stones...Just a peaceful message..that don't waste our money and effort due to your inability to communicate among yourselves..

    As far as your theory that PD2005/2006/2007 should wait..what do you have to say to me..

    1999-Came to US to study MS
    2001-Started working
    2002-EB2
    2003-Joined MBA
    2004-Employer shut down and off went my EB2 2002 before I got my Labor
    2005-EB2
    2006-I140
    2007-I-485 filed in July?????

    Have I satisfied the criteria for FIFO according to you???


    Hello all
    I am a silent visitor of this website.
    Just my 2 cents... Don't think USA is like India where you can do something forcefully. Why don't you guys understand the real problem of USCIS.
    Do you think that by sending flower to USCIS will force them to make EB2/EB3 current for 2005/2006/2007 guys??

    Please try to understand their problem.
    Also India is the great. Why don't you guys just think that India is your home country where you are born and brought up. Why you people can't just wait and watch?? If nothing happens to the so called GC, then why don't you think to pack up and go back to India???????

    My sincere request, please don't do rally, you might be arrested......you never know what they can do..... Don't you think that, it is better to go back to India rather than being embarrassed here in US???

    Isn't it a shame on us to go for Rally to get GC?????:D

    Just think that you will get it when time comes, otherwise pack up.

    Please don't take much tension as life is very short. I am assuring you all, nothing will happen with law suit and flower campaign.Don't irritate USCIS by doing all this please.

    EB2 India
    PD-2005-May
    I140 approved-Sept 2006



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_9%
  • %IMG_DESC_9%



  • chanduv23
    03-24 10:23 AM
    Seems like the HR are stupid. A lot of places I interviewed never had this issue, unless it is a security clearance job where even a GC holder cannot qualify





    hair %IMG_DESC_4% . %IMG_DESC_10%
  • %IMG_DESC_10%



  • akela_topchi
    08-07 01:10 PM
    To add a few more conditions to the aforesaid situation...

    This is 2008.. Both JE and MBA are thinking that they will get their GC in 2009...

    Meanwhile they start arguing.. and many like them join their verbal-struggle..
    Because of this, IV community is divided.. Earlier only 200 people used to respond to action items .. now because of the rift only 100 do... this weakens the momentum that the campaign had..

    Meanwhile, NumbersUSA et all increased their efforts..
    Anti-immigration forces are united and under their pressure all the EB relief bills fail...

    Election is close USCIS shifts the focus to FB visas..
    EB backlog, retrogression goes up..

    JE and MBA still fighting their verbal fight... in same line.. still fighting with words... with few more years added to their wait-time.



    Ok, i will try to make it as simple as possible:
    ......
    ......

    P.S. - I do not support this lawsuit.



    more...


    . %IMG_DESC_11%
  • %IMG_DESC_11%



  • nosightofgc
    09-11 05:23 PM
    I am just curious. If a person has an arrest record, will name check triggers a hit or the FP check? I suspect FP check, but not sure.





    hot %IMG_DESC_5% . %IMG_DESC_12%
  • %IMG_DESC_12%



  • godbless
    01-21 01:56 AM
    I had both a valid visa stamped on my passport and AP. But my wife did not have a stamped visa so I showed her AP and my h1. The immigration inspector said that you both have to use AP to enter. I argued with him a little that I can use my h1 when it is valid but he did not agree and said that I am trying to do a fraud. Well I did not argue much and let him stamp my I 94 with a parole stamp till 01/26/2007. I have now filed for my extension.



    more...


    house %IMG_DESC_17% . %IMG_DESC_13%
  • %IMG_DESC_13%



  • SunnySurya
    08-07 01:26 PM
    You stand is understandable, but I still will urge you to join me. It is of course not illegal but unfair towards the people already in EB2 line. If there were no limits on visas, it will not have been an issue to begin with. Think about the depth of the issue.
    Hi SunnySurya an Rolling_flood,

    I am EB2 and have a Masters but I don't support your case or even the basis of it. Mostly it is because I don't think MOST of the folks who use PD porting are doing it illegally or even cutting through the line undeservedly. If I am not wrong, these folks will have put in the time (work exp wise and/or added higher education) and should rightfully get the position certified as EB2.

    Now granted that there are always a small minority people who genuinely are not deserving. First, can you define in your view what kind of PD porting is unethical?

    Additionally, can you back up your claims by providing any kind of stats of such cases per year and how much impact it really causes to the GC wait time of those already waiting in queue for EB2? Are they that significant for you and Rolling Stone to feel so wronged?

    In conclusion, unlike the unjust labor substitution process, your case is not convincing because I don't think most people availing PD porting are doing anything wrong legally and ethically. I would love to see stats and examples though.

    Regards.





    tattoo %IMG_DESC_6% . %IMG_DESC_14%
  • %IMG_DESC_14%



  • wangwei417
    10-29 04:27 PM
    Done!
    Thanks for providing the template.

    folks, this is really easy and critical to everyone. Please take couple minutes and send these letters



    more...


    pictures %IMG_DESC_7% . %IMG_DESC_15%
  • %IMG_DESC_15%



  • Canadian_Dream
    11-19 09:20 PM
    This comes from conversation with two lawyers who have done this in the past.
    Can you please state the source of ur information.





    dresses %IMG_DESC_12% . %IMG_DESC_16%
  • %IMG_DESC_16%



  • RattuRani
    06-18 03:46 PM
    Natives blame Naturalized citizens/GC Holders/H1s/L1s for taking their job
    Naturalized Citizens/GC Holders blame H1s/L1s for taking their job
    H1 holders blame L1s for taking their job
    L1s blame ImmigrationVoice members for taking their job:D



    more...


    makeup %IMG_DESC_9% . %IMG_DESC_17%
  • %IMG_DESC_17%



  • vkrishn
    08-19 03:46 PM
    Folks,
    I got a call from the Ombudsman Office today morning was told that my case is in "transit". When is asked her what it means she told it is going to be reviewed by an IO. I got the similar response to my SR that "your case is pending adjudication by IO" so don't know what to make out of it in the sense that its been removed from the shelf and sitting in some pile and IO will get to it when he/she can?

    Did any one get their GC approved after their case was in transit? How long did it take?





    girlfriend %IMG_DESC_14% . %IMG_DESC_18%
  • %IMG_DESC_18%



  • EndlessWait
    01-24 02:46 PM
    It is not good disparaging the countries needing TV by calling them idiotic and asking for boycott etc. Please know that you are living in a country (USA) which is far worse than those "idiotic" countries in this respect since 2003. US needs C1 visa for transiting through its airports even when you have a valid VISA stamp in your passport to a destination country and you need to fill eqaully gruelling application (DS 156). Also you need to carry documents for travel purposes and financial support.

    i'm utterly shocked.. dude ...u like to live in pain..u like injustice.. u should see a doctor asap!





    hairstyles %IMG_DESC_11% . %IMG_DESC_19%
  • %IMG_DESC_19%



  • smitha
    07-09 08:42 PM
    Hello all
    I am a silent visitor of this website.
    Just my 2 cents... Don't think USA is like India where you can do something forcefully. Why don't you guys understand the real problem of USCIS.
    Do you think that by sending flower to USCIS will force them to make EB2/EB3 current for 2005/2006/2007 guys??

    Please try to understand their problem.
    Also India is the great. Why don't you guys just think that India is your home country where you are born and brought up. Why you people can't just wait and watch?? If nothing happens to the so called GC, then why don't you think to pack up and go back to India???????

    My sincere request, please don't do rally, you might be arrested......you never know what they can do..... Don't you think that, it is better to go back to India rather than being embarrassed here in US???

    Isn't it a shame on us to go for Rally to get GC?????:D

    Just think that you will get it when time comes, otherwise pack up.

    Please don't take much tension as life is very short. I am assuring you all, nothing will happen with law suit and flower campaign.Don't irritate USCIS by doing all this please.

    EB2 India
    PD-2005-May
    I140 approved-Sept 2006





    sundarpn
    01-02 12:27 AM
    This is useful info. But scary :(:mad:

    I was planning to get my h1b visa revalidation done at Chennai end of Jan '08.

    Can anyone who goes for H1b revalidation post their experiences?

    is this showing any signs of improvement?





    niklshah
    08-23 12:40 AM
    every one is saying we should do that we should do this but how many are doing it actually........it looks like convention of smart people just planning but no implementation...



    No comments:

    Post a Comment