navy seals wallpaper

images for the Navy SEALs.

SOCOM wallpaper. Tags: socom

ingenix

09-19 07:26 AM

Thank you guys - u did a great great job

---

wallpaper SOCOM wallpaper. Tags: socom

purchased Navy SEALs:

singhsa3

04-27 04:19 PM

Supporting Documents
One resource
http://murthyforum.atinfopop.com/4/OpenTopic?a=tpc&s=1024039761&f=7254000912&m=5401097161

Another one
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i765-1/72260699/

One more
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i765-1/71284153/

Another one
http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=16839

---

US Navy SEALs Wallpapers

caydee

03-07 06:00 PM

I have similar situation - I applied for 140 in July 2006. My daughter will turn 21 in July 2007. As I have applied for 140 before she turns 21, she is safe for GC, but will loose H4 status when she turns 21. As per my lawyer's advice I have applied for her F1 so that she can stay and continue her studies in US. When I become eligible to apply for 485, she can be included in the application - but, not as a dependent of H1B holder.

Can you apply for AOS for your daughter with your 485 application after she moves from H4 to F1?

---

2011 purchased Navy SEALs:

much like a Navy Seal

abigel

08-07 08:41 PM

People do not agree and have different ideas - sometimes to the point of personal hurt! - this is natural. They have different interests and even when they have shared goals, sometimes their paths to those shared goals may diverge - this is natural, too. Yes, differences, discussion and divergence can lead to a final separation and then two or mroe new groups are born - and it can happen naturally and it does not have to be rushed or forced through censorship and persecution. But sometimes debates and differences actually help the whole group to stay together and find a better path or a better solution - in the heat of the discussion and in the fight of the dualling arguments a new idea, approach or solution is born. I do think that a lot of the most contentious discussions on this forum are actually the most important and interesting ones because those are the oens that will cut to the heart of the problem and reveal the real depths of the issues. Suppression of diverging opinions is the hallmark of dictatorships.

---

more...

wallpaper us navy seals

anilsal

12-02 09:51 AM

It applies to cases where you already have a approval for extension that starts after the day ur current visa stamp expires. So when u travel and at POE, the officer will perform the so called "last action" and stamp till the validity of your visa stamp. This "last action" is the current status of yours and will invalidate every other action (including the approval for an extension starting after the visa stamp) that was obtained before you travelled.

Wonder if it was some PhD who devised this rule at USCIS.

---

navy seals wallpaper. bad

optimystic

03-05 02:19 PM

The processing date for I -485 EB at nebraska is July 30 2007.

And it happens that my I-485 'Receipt date' is July 30 2007 too ! My notice date is 'Aug 31 2007'

So my question is should my case be logically eligible for processing at nebraska center now that we are in March and my PD is current for March. Or do the processing times at service centers represent notice date and not receipt date (I noticed that in my online case status it states "On August 31, 2007, we received this I485 APPLICATION "....which seems logical since the notice date represents the date when info is entered into computers )

As I mentioned earlier in this thread my I-140 is also already approved.

Is there a number I can call to check with USCIS customer service whether they opened my case for adjudicating it. The only immediate blocker I see now is whether or not I am past the 180 days FBI namecheck as well . Hopefully the USCIS cust rep can tell me that info over the phone. Any body got such info over the phone?

---

more...

USN navy seal 4

anilsal

07-28 09:44 AM

IL AT immigration DOT voice.

You can then be added to the IL mailing list.

---

2010 US Navy SEALs Wallpapers

for the Navy SEALs.

nk2006

09-22 02:42 PM

Just posting the phone numbers on this thread (incase you didnt see them on other threads) - Please call. Lets keep our sceptisism aside for a while (just for 24 hours :)) and call. There is still some chance (otherwise why would they schedule to discuss it).

Trent Franks (R-Ariz.)202- 225-4576
Steve King (R-Iowa)202- 225-4426 (NOT IN FAVOR)
Mike Pence (R-Ind.) 202-225-3021
Louie Gohmert (R-Texas) 202-225-3035
Lamar S. Smith (R-Texas), Ranking Member 202- 225-6906/ 202- 225-4236 (NOT IN FAVOR)
Steve Chabot (R-Ohio) 202-225-2216
Chris Cannon (R-Utah)202- 225-7751
Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) 202-225-2676
Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.)202- 225-5431
J. Randy Forbes (R-Va.)202- 225-6365
Tom Feeney (R-Fla.) 202-225-2706 (NOT IN FAVOR)
Ric Keller (R-Fla.)202- 225-2176
Elton Gallegly (R-Calif.)202- 225-5811
Darrell Issa (R-Calif.)202- 225-3906 (NOT IN FAVOR)
Dan Lungren (R-Calif.)202- 225-5716
Brad Sherman (D-Calif.) 202-225-5911
Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.)202- 225-4176
Rick Boucher (D-Va.) 202-225-3861
Robert C. Scott (D-Va.) (202) 225-8351
Betty Sutton (D-Ohio) 202-225-3401
Howard Coble (R-N.C.) 202-225-3065
Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.)202- 225-3265
John Conyers (D-Mich.), Chairman 202-225-5126
William D. Delahunt (D-Mass.)202- 225-3111
Keith Ellison (D-Minn.) 202-225-4755
Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.)202- 225-8203

---

more...

house navy seals wallpaper.

eb3retro

08-08 02:20 AM

Yes , the employer is Desi. who else can do something like this ? :mad:

After 6 months, can't we simple change employer on H1B and fire the previous attorney and ask him to send all the documents to the new attorney?
Can USCIS send a duplicate receipt notice to our home address on our request?


sent you a PM..check it out..

---

hair much like a Navy Seal

Navy. iPhone Wallpaper id 1832

EndlessWait

12-14 02:15 PM

In our case, the primary applicant has received FP but the dependent has not yet received, has this happened to anyone?

I called Customer Service and now they ask that we wait 180 days from the time the case is transferred to NSC before enquiring about it !

My spouse got the FP but I'm waiting. I'm the primary. I opened 2 SRs but only my wife got the FP, whereas I got a notice to basically wait. god knows

---

more...

Navy Seal Combat Swimmer

eb3retro

09-23 10:46 PM

Centre: Nebraska
I485: July 2
EAD: Approved


hi iheartindia79, is your EAD approved by NE? and where was your I-140 approved from?

---

hot wallpaper us navy seals

Navy Seal Header 1 Wallpaper

bigboy007

11-23 09:59 AM

This signature waived is normal because of something having to do with when they scan the card, and if your signature is there, then it could cross the line where the machine scans your card. So I have heard from others online in these posts this is valid since August 1 FOR EVERYONE and your picture is there, so this is not an issue. What I am wondering about is why is this EAD only valid for one year when first it was valid for two years, why have they changed this? And if your i-485 green card case is pending, and you have gotten your i-765 EAD in your hand do they approve your i-485 green card fast? SOMEONE PLEASE RESPOND
I could answered better if you would have filled up your profile... anyways... many ppl are scared of even accepting or providing dates..

what is your PD ? Sooner the PD there is a good chance for being 1 year. if your PD is far away or chance of being current is not soon it will be for 2 years.. unless officer erroneously submitted for one year...anyway there is no work around you need to hang on.

---

more...


house Navy Seals Live Wallpaper

navy seals

GCOP

09-11 01:33 PM

Very Good Research. I just gave you Green.
Since there was talk of the HR 5882 being taken up in two months time in a lame duck session, I thought it might be helpful to have this on this page.

Source = http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/lameduck.htm

Lame Duck Sessions of the U.S. Congress
Once rare, now commonplace
By Robert Longley, About.com

Lame duck sessions of the U.S. Congress happen in even numbered years when Congress has to reconvene following the November general election to take care of unfinished legislation. Some lawmakers who return for this session lost their bids for reelection and will not be in the next Congress. Hence, they are informally called "lame duck" members participating in a "lame duck" session.
The possibility of lame duck sessions of Congress began in 1935, when the 20th Amendment1 to the U.S. Constitution2 took effect. Under this amendment, ratified in 1933, regular sessions of Congress begin on January 3 of each year, unless Congress passes a law in the previous session changing the date. Also, the terms of members begin and end on January 3 of odd-numbered years. Under these arrangements, any meeting of Congress between election day in an even-numbered year and the following January 3 is considered a lame duck session.

Why lame duck sessions are bad
Lame duck sessions are never desirable. Defeated lame duck lawmakers, knowing they will not have jobs in the new Congress, either tend to "just go through the motions" while debating and voting on remaining important legislation or, in worse cases, attempt to hinder or even damage the lawmaking process. On the state level, the legislatures of only 11 states even allow lame duck sessions.

By far the most dismal scenario for a lame duck session is whenever one of the two major political parties has taken away majority control of one or both houses of Congress from the other party, as happened after the 2006 mid-term election, when the Democrats won control of both the House and Senate from the Republicans. In these instances, with political tempers already running hot, the temptation for lame duck members to vent their frustrations by working to stall good bills, while turning bad bills into worse laws, becomes even greater.

Why lame duck sessions happen
Once rare, lame duck sessions have become all too common. The final days of the 109th Congress in November and December of 2006 became the 16th lame duck session since 1940.

The typical "target" date for the annual adjournment of each session of Congress is during the first week in October. The target adjournment date has become a total myth in recent years. The first session of the 109th Congress, for example, did not achieve final adjournment until Dec. 22, 2005.

During far too many recent years, the main reason for lame duck sessions has been Congress' failure to complete its work on the spending, or "appropriations" bills that form the basis of the annual federal budget. By law, the federal budget process3, including passage of the spending bills, begins the first Monday in February of each year and should be concluded by October 1st, the start of the federal government's Federal Fiscal Year. Failing to pass the spending bill by October 1, Congress is compelled to pass "continuing resolutions4," legislation that allows the government operate temporarily without an approved budget at the previous year's spending levels.

Lame duck sessions: some bad, some not so bad
Some sessions are not particularly productive, often because of political disputes and the difficulties of reaching legislative decisions in a post-election environment. In 1982 and 2002, for example, Congress returned after the November election in part to complete work on most of the spending bills. In each case, it failed to do so and the new Congress had to enact large continuing resolutions to fund government operations for the fiscal year already in progress.

Other lame duck sessions, such as the one held in 1980, have been more productive. On that occasion, Congress approved budget resolution and reconciliation measures, five regular appropriations bills and a continuing resolution, an Alaska lands bill, a landmark environmental cleanup "superfund" bill, a measure extending revenue sharing, a revision of military pay and other benefits, and a bill changing the appointment power of the Senate President pro tempore.

This About.com page has been optimized for print. To view this page in its original form, please visit: http://usgovinfo.about.com/od/uscongress/a/lameduck.htm

�2008 About.com, Inc., a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserve

---

tattoo navy seals wallpaper. bad

SOCOM-U_S_-Navy-SEALs-988-3

LIDIYA

09-13 08:29 PM

Date you filed - July 2nd
Receipt Date - AUG 27 (or very close to it. Sorry, I don't remember actual date)
Service center - TSC
If EAD received - SEP 1st (both EAD's)
FP - SEP 8th (both)
SSN - applied on SEP 6, received on SEP 13th (today)

Good luck!

---

more...


pictures USN navy seal 4

navy seals wallpaper 11 och

InTheMoment

02-08 03:45 PM

After following release dates since the past year ...I predict it will be out either tomm (9th) or Monday (12th) ;)

---

dresses Navy Seal Header 1 Wallpaper

Navy Seal Combat Swimmer

polapragada

10-14 01:09 PM

2 months movement for for EB2-I to June 2003. EB3-I 3 months.

http://mumbai.usconsulate.gov/cut_off_dates.html

India
E1 Current
E2 1 June 2003
E3 1 October 2001

Let us hope dates move forward in December.

Now a days INDIA is faster than US;)

---

more...


makeup house navy seals wallpaper.

Navy Seals Live Wallpaper

virald

10-04 11:34 AM

We cannot predict the future but we can predict with some given statistics!
If people who got their AP from NSC could just menion how long it took for them to receive ap document it would be statistical and we can there upon make some judgements !!
Noone is asking for exact dates from USCIS. We are all still very much in a limbo and this is just for getting some heads up!!

TSC is taking about three months. Mine took three months and I applied on July 2nd to TSC. So, my guess is statistically, at least 3+ months for NSC, since they will be concentrating on sending out EAD's.
But, I leave it to others to give specific numbers.

---

girlfriend SOCOM-U_S_-Navy-SEALs-988-3

navy seals logo.

gclabor07

06-16 05:07 PM

Try this company for a mortgage. When I bought my house in 2006, I used them. They had the best rates, closing costs are relatively cheaper too. They are a small company, but are very customer friendly. Once they loan you the money, eventually, they will sell that mortgage to one of the big banks -- Countrywide, Citi etc. At that point, you'll need to start dealing with the new company.

http://www.homefinanceofamerica.com/

---

hairstyles Navy Seal Combat Swimmer

wallpaper U.S. Navy Seals Logo

gene77

10-19 02:59 PM

Must the PD of the 'I140 to be interfiled' be current to request interfiling??

---

Better_Days

09-19 03:08 PM

The Process of giving Birthright citizenship is a law called Jus Soli(14th Amendment) which was implemented in 1900's . Numbersusa and others are fighting to change the Jus soli to jus sanguinis which gives citizenship based on the child's parents Status to reduce the "Numbers".India Abolished Jus Soli in 1987 and dosent offer Birthright citizenship. I think going this Route to discuss the possibility to fight for parents naturalisation based on child's status will make us no different from Illegal Immigrants.

belive it or not, I knew that. I mean the part about the US, not the part about India as I don't hail from there.

The point that I was trying to make but did not state clearly enough was that I feel that when one has a political agenda whether it is pro or anti immigration, children should be kept out of it. Labeling children like anchor babies is dehumanizing. I believe that when kids are involved, as human beings, everyone should always be concerned about their best interest rather than what our political view.

This is why I hate the term anchor babies. The antis are willing to even dehumanize kids if it fits with their political view.

---

optimystic

02-15 09:01 PM

Ok, so my PD got current (EB3 India). What next?

1) I dont think I can expect that my PD remains current in the next Visa bulletin as well. The dates might retrogress again...right?

2) When will they open my case for adjudication? Will it happen within the month of March? Will ALL cases eligble to be opened in a particular Visa bulletin month are GURANTEED to be opened atleast to determine the next step (like sending it to namecheck, FP etc ) for that case?
(Dont tell me nothing is GUARANTEED with USCIS :) . I mean to a reasonable levels of the word 'GUARANTEE' ! )

3) What further factors/queues/backlogs determine when a case will be opened for adjudication when the PD is current and I-140 is also already approved & FP done.

4) Namecheck - The new rule of auto-approval/clearance past 180 days.....when does the 180 day count start from?

--- Receipt date of I-485 application OR
--- Date when the application is opened for adjudication following the PD becoming current for that person OR
--- How can one find out what their namecheck status is? If we are past 180 days, is it safe to assume that we are cleared on Namecheck?

5) Will anything at all happen in my case during the remaining of this month Feb? Like pre-adjudication of my case etc in anticipation of my PD becoming current in March (as you can see by my IV handle name....hihgly optimistic :) ) ....

6)Should I be watching out for any LUDs this month or don't even bother until March


I hope the other IV brethren who might have already got their GCs and other Gurus/experts on the forum can probably shed some light on these questions, the time lines/milestones involved etc

Thanks in advance.

---