reddymjm
09-25 09:56 AM
What is the normal time frame for receiving AP papers?
My wife's AP papers were mailed on 17th Sep but we are still waiting for them.
Are they sent to applicants home or attorney's office?
Thanks in advance.
485_spouse
If your attorney had filled A G28 right. He will get them. Ususally they come in 3 days or so after they said they mailed it.
My wife's AP papers were mailed on 17th Sep but we are still waiting for them.
Are they sent to applicants home or attorney's office?
Thanks in advance.
485_spouse
If your attorney had filled A G28 right. He will get them. Ususally they come in 3 days or so after they said they mailed it.
wallpaper house mr. rogers has tattoos
sbind_77
10-25 12:49 PM
chintainfogc
Did you got any reply for your SR?
Did you got any reply for your SR?
techbuyer77
10-06 12:08 PM
Husband is still pending ?????:D:D:D
Yes he is still pending :confused:
Yes he is still pending :confused:
2011 mr. rogers tattoos mr. rogers
Drifter
04-06 02:49 PM
A core member has been helping me in this matter. I really have to thank the core for being so responsive and for giving this matter the kind of attention it deserves. There is some progress in this case and the quickness with which the IV Core acted on this and moved the issue forward gives me and my family hope.
We have been patiently waiting in the immigration queue for close to 10 years and finally when we are so close to the end of this long journey become victims of a clerical error which was completely out of our control. IV has provided our family with hope. I thank IV for that
We pray that this issue gets resolved and I hope that no one else has to go thorugh this trying situation.
We have been patiently waiting in the immigration queue for close to 10 years and finally when we are so close to the end of this long journey become victims of a clerical error which was completely out of our control. IV has provided our family with hope. I thank IV for that
We pray that this issue gets resolved and I hope that no one else has to go thorugh this trying situation.
more...
fittan
03-18 09:35 AM
I don't believe it...did you guys even read the original thread? He is asking about being laid off while on EAD while you went on a tangent about H1B status, buying furniture and rental lease!
Also, poorslumdog, who told you that you that "once you are in EAD and got laid off...you lose your status"?
The only person that makes sense on this thread is ramaonline. Javadeveloper, since you've filed your AOS, you'll be in legal status with or without a job. You don't even need to have a job now...GC is for a future job offer. EAD has nothing to do with it. Has it been 180 days since you filed your I-485? If so, your I-140 is safe since your employer loses "control" over it. Because your I-140 is not approved, using AC21 to port is quite risky but this may be your only path.
One last thing, I hope things work out and your employer re-hires you BUT you really have to assume that they won't and plan for you worse. Remember no one cares about your GC more than you...
Also, poorslumdog, who told you that you that "once you are in EAD and got laid off...you lose your status"?
The only person that makes sense on this thread is ramaonline. Javadeveloper, since you've filed your AOS, you'll be in legal status with or without a job. You don't even need to have a job now...GC is for a future job offer. EAD has nothing to do with it. Has it been 180 days since you filed your I-485? If so, your I-140 is safe since your employer loses "control" over it. Because your I-140 is not approved, using AC21 to port is quite risky but this may be your only path.
One last thing, I hope things work out and your employer re-hires you BUT you really have to assume that they won't and plan for you worse. Remember no one cares about your GC more than you...
Green.Tech
03-18 12:05 PM
...and the confusion regarding this rule continues :)
more...
Dhundhun
08-05 03:48 PM
All,
anyone knows about this visa, is this family sponsorship GC ?
Family Second Preference (F2): Spouses, minor children, and unmarried sons and daughters (over age 20) of lawful permanent residents. (114,200) At least seventy-seven percent of all visas available for this category will go to the spouses and children; the remainder will be allocated to unmarried sons and daughters.
What do you want to know? I130 and I485 needs to be filed. Both Counselor Processing as well as AOS allowed.
This is current Priority Date
--- China ---- India
2A 01OCT03 01OCT03 For Spouse and Children
2B 01NOV99 01NOV99 For Unmarried children above 21
For EB based guys, my understanding is that this PD is same as Labor Certification PD which was used for GC - correct me if I am wrong.
anyone knows about this visa, is this family sponsorship GC ?
Family Second Preference (F2): Spouses, minor children, and unmarried sons and daughters (over age 20) of lawful permanent residents. (114,200) At least seventy-seven percent of all visas available for this category will go to the spouses and children; the remainder will be allocated to unmarried sons and daughters.
What do you want to know? I130 and I485 needs to be filed. Both Counselor Processing as well as AOS allowed.
This is current Priority Date
--- China ---- India
2A 01OCT03 01OCT03 For Spouse and Children
2B 01NOV99 01NOV99 For Unmarried children above 21
For EB based guys, my understanding is that this PD is same as Labor Certification PD which was used for GC - correct me if I am wrong.
2010 Fred Rogers in his
zerozerozeven
07-12 11:23 AM
Carl Shusterman says that State Department's Charles Oppenheimer indicating that there will big advances for EB2 China & India. Hopefully it is true
Immigration Attorneys, Schedule a Legal Consultation with Former INS Trial Attorney Carl Shusterman (http://www.shusterman.com/)
how is this guys' track record in the past? i dont want to raise my hopes too much and get disappointed...
Immigration Attorneys, Schedule a Legal Consultation with Former INS Trial Attorney Carl Shusterman (http://www.shusterman.com/)
how is this guys' track record in the past? i dont want to raise my hopes too much and get disappointed...
more...
GCOP
04-07 08:51 AM
Like rollover minutes for a mobile phone plan .... I think we should propose USCIS to rollover the unused visa numbers to the next year. :D
Can you please let us know if we are making progress towards unused Visa Recapture ? Thanks
Can you please let us know if we are making progress towards unused Visa Recapture ? Thanks
hair Mister Rogers, Carmen Miranda,
admin
02-28 12:23 PM
Our strategic Counsel, Quinn Gillespie & Associates (QGA) has begun setting up meetings for us with lawmakers and congressional staff in a big way.
Three of our volunteers are in Washington DC this week. Yesterday, we met with Chief Counsel of the House Sub Committee on Immigration and also California Congresswoman Zoe Logfren's Senior Aide and get the House view on Comprehensive Immigration Bill. We were also interviewed by Kate Ackley, Reporter for Roll Call (http://www.rollcall.com/). Roll Call is THE newspaper read by lawmakers and their staff and the best way for us to get the message to them.
Today they have already been to White House and spoken to senior people to get the Administration's view on immigration. They have 2 more meeting for the day.
They have another full day on Friday and Monday also, when they will be meeting with 3-4 Senator's staff on each day. All these senator's are high powered senators who will be able to very much further our cause.
More details of these meeting will follow shortly, when they are able to get a breather from all those meetings.
To maintain this kind of excellent service provided by QGA, we urge our members to please contribute monetarily to IV.
Three of our volunteers are in Washington DC this week. Yesterday, we met with Chief Counsel of the House Sub Committee on Immigration and also California Congresswoman Zoe Logfren's Senior Aide and get the House view on Comprehensive Immigration Bill. We were also interviewed by Kate Ackley, Reporter for Roll Call (http://www.rollcall.com/). Roll Call is THE newspaper read by lawmakers and their staff and the best way for us to get the message to them.
Today they have already been to White House and spoken to senior people to get the Administration's view on immigration. They have 2 more meeting for the day.
They have another full day on Friday and Monday also, when they will be meeting with 3-4 Senator's staff on each day. All these senator's are high powered senators who will be able to very much further our cause.
More details of these meeting will follow shortly, when they are able to get a breather from all those meetings.
To maintain this kind of excellent service provided by QGA, we urge our members to please contribute monetarily to IV.
more...
glus
01-24 07:48 PM
contributions have to be voluntary.. finger pointing would be of no good & on the contrary will be counter-productive..
I do not this it is a bad idea to post it, it is just that can someonce show me the benefit of showing that , for example, member A contributed $200 and member B $100?
I am open to discusion about it......
I do not this it is a bad idea to post it, it is just that can someonce show me the benefit of showing that , for example, member A contributed $200 and member B $100?
I am open to discusion about it......
hot mr rogers tattoos. Mr Rogers Tattoo. Mr. Rogers; Mr. Rogers.
am4gc
11-30 02:08 PM
Question...see below in bold
The issue is that my company lawyer said that there will be a need for a visa stamping done for the extension because of the Last action rule. The murthy forum reference is something I dug up via google.
Because the extension will be for a future date (March 1).
-- Question: Is this extension based on I-140 is different than the extension you get for the second 3 year out of 6 year? If not, then why I-94 can not be given date adding the extension of 3 year ?
Current visa stamp is till Feb 28, 2007. So if the officer gives a new I-94 with Feb 28, 2007 as the validity date, the attorneys claim that it will invalidate the approved extension due to a "Last Action Rule".
It is hard to trust these corporate lawyers.
The issue is that my company lawyer said that there will be a need for a visa stamping done for the extension because of the Last action rule. The murthy forum reference is something I dug up via google.
Because the extension will be for a future date (March 1).
-- Question: Is this extension based on I-140 is different than the extension you get for the second 3 year out of 6 year? If not, then why I-94 can not be given date adding the extension of 3 year ?
Current visa stamp is till Feb 28, 2007. So if the officer gives a new I-94 with Feb 28, 2007 as the validity date, the attorneys claim that it will invalidate the approved extension due to a "Last Action Rule".
It is hard to trust these corporate lawyers.
more...
house Mr Rogers Tattoos. rank my
Administrator2
03-17 03:28 PM
^^^
Dear rxsimha,
Please start a new thread for your question.
Thanks,
Dear rxsimha,
Please start a new thread for your question.
Thanks,
tattoo mr rogers tattoos. mr. rogers
letstalklc
07-09 05:15 PM
we should ask him when EB3 India will get current? He will stop eating after that. :)
Its so funny, I gave green too....
Its so funny, I gave green too....
more...
pictures Fred Rogers a/k/a Mister
eagerr2i
07-01 01:52 PM
http://www.kpfk.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=260&Itemid=82&lang=en
Click on the link above for listening to streaming media.
The call in number is (818) 985 5735.
Click on the link above for listening to streaming media.
The call in number is (818) 985 5735.
dresses Mr. Tackett opposed drug and
dilipb
02-16 02:01 PM
Also I dont see anywhere the real PD mentioned anywhere.
Sorry I might be blind or really really drunk.
But if someone can point me that PD mentioned anywhere above.
Sorry I might be blind or really really drunk.
But if someone can point me that PD mentioned anywhere above.
more...
makeup mr rogers tattoos. earnestine
manderson
03-27 01:03 PM
:eek: Source: Immigration-law,
Senator Durbin apparently going after Desi employers and Desi Outsourcing companies !
03/27/2007: Continuing Confusion in Immigration Reform Legislation
It is only one week that the immigrant community was elated by the introduction of a fantastic immigration reform bill (STRIVE) by Congressman Gutierrez in the House, but on the Senate side, there is a mess that is continously developing. We reported earlier that the two bipartisan leaders of Senator McCain and Senator Kennedy reportedly rifted their partnership. Now, another Senator is about to add confusion to this mess. News report indicates that Senator Durbin of Illinois may introduce within this week a legislation to put a block on the H-1B abuse and restrict the H-1B worker petitions. This move is totally shocking considering the fact that a rosy H-1B reform was just introduced as part of the STRIVE Act of 2007.
Reportedly, Senator Durbin will propose to make it mandatory that the employers engage in the recruitment of U.S. workers prior to filing a H-1B petition and file sworn statement in the form of attestation that they failed to locate a qualified U.S. worker as part of the H-1B petition. Currently, such attestation is mandated for the so-called H-1B dependent employers only. Additionally, the proposal reportedly would mandate the DOL's annual audit of the employers hiring 100 or more employees out of which 15% constitutes H-1B employees. Once such proposal is enacted, there will be substantial changes in the flow of foreign professional workers. At this time, H-1B visas lay a stepping stone for foreign professional workers to land in this country and to apply for permanent residence.
The late news that the FY 2008 H-1B cap may reach in one day on April 2, 2008 indeed raised a concern in the country as it can be taken as a pervasive abuse of this visa petitions by some employers. Part of the current clog in the employment-based immigrant visas for professional workers is arguably associated with the abuse of these visa petitions. Please stay tuned to this website for the development of this important news.
Senator Durbin apparently going after Desi employers and Desi Outsourcing companies !
03/27/2007: Continuing Confusion in Immigration Reform Legislation
It is only one week that the immigrant community was elated by the introduction of a fantastic immigration reform bill (STRIVE) by Congressman Gutierrez in the House, but on the Senate side, there is a mess that is continously developing. We reported earlier that the two bipartisan leaders of Senator McCain and Senator Kennedy reportedly rifted their partnership. Now, another Senator is about to add confusion to this mess. News report indicates that Senator Durbin of Illinois may introduce within this week a legislation to put a block on the H-1B abuse and restrict the H-1B worker petitions. This move is totally shocking considering the fact that a rosy H-1B reform was just introduced as part of the STRIVE Act of 2007.
Reportedly, Senator Durbin will propose to make it mandatory that the employers engage in the recruitment of U.S. workers prior to filing a H-1B petition and file sworn statement in the form of attestation that they failed to locate a qualified U.S. worker as part of the H-1B petition. Currently, such attestation is mandated for the so-called H-1B dependent employers only. Additionally, the proposal reportedly would mandate the DOL's annual audit of the employers hiring 100 or more employees out of which 15% constitutes H-1B employees. Once such proposal is enacted, there will be substantial changes in the flow of foreign professional workers. At this time, H-1B visas lay a stepping stone for foreign professional workers to land in this country and to apply for permanent residence.
The late news that the FY 2008 H-1B cap may reach in one day on April 2, 2008 indeed raised a concern in the country as it can be taken as a pervasive abuse of this visa petitions by some employers. Part of the current clog in the employment-based immigrant visas for professional workers is arguably associated with the abuse of these visa petitions. Please stay tuned to this website for the development of this important news.
girlfriend very mr rogers tattoos.
abigel
08-07 08:41 PM
People do not agree and have different ideas - sometimes to the point of personal hurt! - this is natural. They have different interests and even when they have shared goals, sometimes their paths to those shared goals may diverge - this is natural, too. Yes, differences, discussion and divergence can lead to a final separation and then two or mroe new groups are born - and it can happen naturally and it does not have to be rushed or forced through censorship and persecution. But sometimes debates and differences actually help the whole group to stay together and find a better path or a better solution - in the heat of the discussion and in the fight of the dualling arguments a new idea, approach or solution is born. I do think that a lot of the most contentious discussions on this forum are actually the most important and interesting ones because those are the oens that will cut to the heart of the problem and reveal the real depths of the issues. Suppression of diverging opinions is the hallmark of dictatorships.
hairstyles Mr Rogers Wore a Sweater
gc_dreamer_2010
01-27 05:36 PM
I tweeted to the ones that had twitter accounts. I will also give these guys a call and post letters.
@JudgeTedPoe Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
4 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
@louiegohmert Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
5 minutes ago
@SteveKingIA Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
6 minutes ago
@eltongallegly24 Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
@JudgeTedPoe Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
4 minutes ago Favorite Reply Delete
@louiegohmert Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
5 minutes ago
@SteveKingIA Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
6 minutes ago
@eltongallegly24 Sir.Please vote 4 HR 43 to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act in helping Employment based advanced degree immigrants
shirish
03-07 04:13 PM
I have heard the above from a lawyer. I think there is lot truth in the above statement.
However, in teaching the Univ processes H1B and most faculty pay the USCIS fees. I have written a check to USCIS for my H1B fees. Most faculty also pay their GC dues including lawyer + USCIS fees.
I have also heard that faculty can negotiate for the Deptt to pay the H1B + GC fees.
In my case i paid for the H1B expenses (includig lawyer fees) my self , but my company re-embered the amount once i completed three months. Same with GC, i paid till now, 3500 as lawyer fees. Filling fees extra. But haven't paid any filing fee yet as i am waiting for my PD to be current. And the company is going to give me the money i paid till now back once i complete three years. After which company will pay every thing.
However, in teaching the Univ processes H1B and most faculty pay the USCIS fees. I have written a check to USCIS for my H1B fees. Most faculty also pay their GC dues including lawyer + USCIS fees.
I have also heard that faculty can negotiate for the Deptt to pay the H1B + GC fees.
In my case i paid for the H1B expenses (includig lawyer fees) my self , but my company re-embered the amount once i completed three months. Same with GC, i paid till now, 3500 as lawyer fees. Filling fees extra. But haven't paid any filing fee yet as i am waiting for my PD to be current. And the company is going to give me the money i paid till now back once i complete three years. After which company will pay every thing.
pitha
08-14 01:58 PM
I like your optimistic attitude but unfortunately I don�t share it because of past and current behavior of USCIS, like for instance how they willfully disregarded the 180 day name check memo. Do you really believe them when they say name check will be cleared in 2009, just like the current name check memo the fbi name check clearance will be thrown in a dustbin. If by a miracle name check is solved they will come up with some other check delay for example IBIS name check delay. the bottom line is if there is a will there will be a way, USCIS has no will what so ever to help us. Good luck to everyone but just build a reservoir of patience because if you have hope on USCIS you will pay dearly.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
USCIS is trying to make EB2 all countries Current sometime during FY 2009. Of course "a few" 2004, 2005 cases will still be pending past Oct08 but hopefully not too many.
If EB1 and EB2 are shown as current soon, then the DOS can transfer the so-called "spillover" into EB3 ROW, then into EB3 IN & CH.
Based on available numbers, EB3 India / China will see rapid movement in dates April 09 Visa Bulletin onwards.
What will happen during 2009 in all likely hood is the following,
Almost all EB1 spillover will go to EB3. (~ 25k)
Some of EB1 and all of EB2 spillover will go to EB2 IN/CH (~ 10k to 15k)
In 2009, there will be no more Name Check delays - therefore expect rapid EB3 approvals after April 09.
No comments:
Post a Comment