bbct
02-17 05:51 PM
Also be prepared for a backlash ..make sure you have your bases covered.
-good luck
kris
I have an email reply saying -
1) They are not going to provide a corrected W2 since they changed the payroll company starting 01/01/2009
2) The HR has asked me to report those wages even without a W2
3) They also wrote they have not received the Insurance Company payment statements which was not true because the Insurance Company did mailed those documents in the 2nd week of January and the HR also confirmed over the phone that they have received.
I have the statements from the Insurance Company that shows SS and Medicare taxes withheld. The statements also say it should be reported in the year end W2. I have also faxed the Insurance Company statements to them and have a confirmation report.
I really didn't want to file a complaint but since my wife has to receive W2 for the next year 2009 also, I felt they might do the same next year.
-good luck
kris
I have an email reply saying -
1) They are not going to provide a corrected W2 since they changed the payroll company starting 01/01/2009
2) The HR has asked me to report those wages even without a W2
3) They also wrote they have not received the Insurance Company payment statements which was not true because the Insurance Company did mailed those documents in the 2nd week of January and the HR also confirmed over the phone that they have received.
I have the statements from the Insurance Company that shows SS and Medicare taxes withheld. The statements also say it should be reported in the year end W2. I have also faxed the Insurance Company statements to them and have a confirmation report.
I really didn't want to file a complaint but since my wife has to receive W2 for the next year 2009 also, I felt they might do the same next year.
wallpaper This aby is just 26 weeks
xwndtkot
07-30 02:46 AM
I am in the same boat. My 1st paper file was rejected the same reasons (incorrect fee and no I485 notice.)
so I efiled right away after i got the returned package on june 24. I received the notice a week later dated June 24. Since then, no news... no updated.
Since that people who filed the 1st week of June had already got their renewal notices or physical cards.......
mine current exp on Aug 14... so far I only have 2 weeks....
will I get anything within 2 weeks??????
Anyone out here file around June 24 at TSC and got any news???????
Thx
so I efiled right away after i got the returned package on june 24. I received the notice a week later dated June 24. Since then, no news... no updated.
Since that people who filed the 1st week of June had already got their renewal notices or physical cards.......
mine current exp on Aug 14... so far I only have 2 weeks....
will I get anything within 2 weeks??????
Anyone out here file around June 24 at TSC and got any news???????
Thx
gc4me
02-11 01:48 PM
Guys/Gals,
Please predict about eb3 ROW movement as well.
When do you think it will move to 2004 APR?
Please predict about eb3 ROW movement as well.
When do you think it will move to 2004 APR?
2011 7 weeks after conception):
kumar_77
06-19 08:05 PM
Still no update from MI chapter ....:rolleyes:
more...
number30
03-18 02:32 PM
Here is my situation, someone please suggest me:
I am using EAD to work for my GC sponsoring company and I got laid off. My HR says that they are going to inform USCIS that I am no longer working for them. HR also says that they won’t cancel my approved I-140 and going to rehire me once I get the new project.
My question:
When I joined them there is information to USCIS.I just filled I-9 form and gave it to the company, no information to USCIS. Now when I got terminated what is the need for the company to inform this to USCIS? Anyhow I am going to join them once I get the new project in couple of months. Is it a new law? Will there be any problem at the POE if travel outside US and come back using AP? Is there any chance that USCIS sends me RFE?
Thanks In Advance
If you are not on H1 there is no reason to inform the USCIS. Make sure that they are not including your I-140 receipt number or A#.
Actually informing that you do not have a job is sufficent to revoke your I-140.
I am using EAD to work for my GC sponsoring company and I got laid off. My HR says that they are going to inform USCIS that I am no longer working for them. HR also says that they won’t cancel my approved I-140 and going to rehire me once I get the new project.
My question:
When I joined them there is information to USCIS.I just filled I-9 form and gave it to the company, no information to USCIS. Now when I got terminated what is the need for the company to inform this to USCIS? Anyhow I am going to join them once I get the new project in couple of months. Is it a new law? Will there be any problem at the POE if travel outside US and come back using AP? Is there any chance that USCIS sends me RFE?
Thanks In Advance
If you are not on H1 there is no reason to inform the USCIS. Make sure that they are not including your I-140 receipt number or A#.
Actually informing that you do not have a job is sufficent to revoke your I-140.
delhirocks
07-11 04:55 PM
Dependents don't need SS# to file. Only primary applicant is required to have SSN.
You need either a SSN or a TIN to claim someone as a dependent. (Iam not sure if it applies to kids, but surely to adults)
You need either a SSN or a TIN to claim someone as a dependent. (Iam not sure if it applies to kids, but surely to adults)
more...
kiran_k02
03-22 09:38 PM
Hello,
Yes, as my PD is Feb 2005, this implies that the case has been pre-adjudicated as of now pending new finger prints.
My case was originally at NSC, was then send to MSC (National Benefits Center) and then was sent to local USCIS office in San Francisco where I went for an interview and then had this request for documents. The processing dates for San Francisco field office as of now for I-485 are Aug 1, 2008. So, I'm assuming that they have cleared all the cases that reached them by 31 July 2008 and that NSC sent my case file to them by 31st July 2008.
The IO who interviewed me was different than the one who has worked on my case since.
Yes, thanks for the wishes...but in this process, nothing is certain till the physical receipt of the cards, right? :)
PS: As far as I know, fingerprints and medical records are the two documents that may expire...apart from the applicant! ;)
Good reminder to all of us, which we keep forgetting (about our own expiry) :).
Anyway, I would suggest to cut short your trip if possible and finish this pending work ASAP.
In any case, my wishes are with you, even though you are cutting the line :).
Yes, as my PD is Feb 2005, this implies that the case has been pre-adjudicated as of now pending new finger prints.
My case was originally at NSC, was then send to MSC (National Benefits Center) and then was sent to local USCIS office in San Francisco where I went for an interview and then had this request for documents. The processing dates for San Francisco field office as of now for I-485 are Aug 1, 2008. So, I'm assuming that they have cleared all the cases that reached them by 31 July 2008 and that NSC sent my case file to them by 31st July 2008.
The IO who interviewed me was different than the one who has worked on my case since.
Yes, thanks for the wishes...but in this process, nothing is certain till the physical receipt of the cards, right? :)
PS: As far as I know, fingerprints and medical records are the two documents that may expire...apart from the applicant! ;)
Good reminder to all of us, which we keep forgetting (about our own expiry) :).
Anyway, I would suggest to cut short your trip if possible and finish this pending work ASAP.
In any case, my wishes are with you, even though you are cutting the line :).
2010 by the embryo stop the
polapragada
03-16 11:28 PM
Are you referring to OP ( ganguteli )
"I saw this on an anti immigrant site by a M*****r. "
This is his first line of the post.
1. First Correct your profile
2. He deserves it
"I saw this on an anti immigrant site by a M*****r. "
This is his first line of the post.
1. First Correct your profile
2. He deserves it
more...
kirupa
04-03 04:44 PM
Scythe - that would mean that the three tied entries would get around $85 dollars (150+100 divided by 3), and that seems a bit unfair considering second place is $150 and third place is $100.
I'll get the poll up right now. It took me a little longer than expected because Temp poked me in the eye with his poke.
:P
I'll get the poll up right now. It took me a little longer than expected because Temp poked me in the eye with his poke.
:P
hair BABY AT 10-12 WEEKS AFTER
vardinishankar
03-02 03:11 PM
Thanks Krishna and snathan! That answers most of my questions.
snathan:
11) is it possible to switch the GC processing to "future employment", although the Labor/I-140 were approved with the understanding that I was to continue working for the same employer?
12) is the H1 visa/Priority Date of approved labor/I-140 carried over when the individual changes citizenship - from Indian to Canadian?
NO
I guess you meant "NO" to # 11 and "YES" to #12 - right?
snathan:
11) is it possible to switch the GC processing to "future employment", although the Labor/I-140 were approved with the understanding that I was to continue working for the same employer?
12) is the H1 visa/Priority Date of approved labor/I-140 carried over when the individual changes citizenship - from Indian to Canadian?
NO
I guess you meant "NO" to # 11 and "YES" to #12 - right?
more...
immi2006
05-27 09:41 AM
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/05/27/MNG07J3A5K1.DTL
hot A aby can remember songs that
Lou_Sifffer
04-18 12:24 AM
I believe Lou was referring to conversing on the internet. It definitely isn't a turn on to an employer if you are a 1337 h4><()r. You have to be able to get your words across. That is not to say that you can't use a bit of slang.
wow! a breath of fresh air.
Thanks Brad!
That, and the AZ State Labor Statutes, were my points exactly.
AP:
Jnicklo has nothing to fear from me. He is his own worst enemy. He just doesn't realize it yet.
wow! a breath of fresh air.
Thanks Brad!
That, and the AZ State Labor Statutes, were my points exactly.
AP:
Jnicklo has nothing to fear from me. He is his own worst enemy. He just doesn't realize it yet.
more...
house a 21-week-old fetus weeks,
champu
03-12 07:04 PM
Friends,
Any advice on above post.
Thanks.
This is how it should be done...
- request USCIS to port your PD from already approved I-140 from past employer
USCIS may or may not do it for you
- if not apply for I-485 using Category of 2nd (should be EB2) and PD from 1st one. You need to attach both of these with I-485 application and of course a covering letter stating what you are doing.
Here is the extract from the law -
QUOTE
(3) Priority Date Based on Earlier Petition.
If an alien is the beneficiary of two (or more) approved employment-based immigrant visa petitions, the priority of the earlier petition may be applied to all subsequently-filed employment-based petitions. For example:
Company A files a labor certification request on behalf of an alien ("Joe") as a janitor on January 10, 2003. The DOL issues the certification on March 20, 2003. Company A later files, and USCIS approves, a relating I-140 visa petition under the EB-3 category. On July 15, 2003, Joe files a second I-140 visa petition in his own behalf as a rocket scientist under the EB-1 category, which USCIS approves. Joe is entitled to use the January 10, 2003, priority date to apply for adjustment under either the EB-1 or the EB-3 classification.
UNQUOTE
Disclaimer -
I am not a lawyer and this is not a legal advise. You may want to talk a immigration attorney for exact interpretation
Any advice on above post.
Thanks.
This is how it should be done...
- request USCIS to port your PD from already approved I-140 from past employer
USCIS may or may not do it for you
- if not apply for I-485 using Category of 2nd (should be EB2) and PD from 1st one. You need to attach both of these with I-485 application and of course a covering letter stating what you are doing.
Here is the extract from the law -
QUOTE
(3) Priority Date Based on Earlier Petition.
If an alien is the beneficiary of two (or more) approved employment-based immigrant visa petitions, the priority of the earlier petition may be applied to all subsequently-filed employment-based petitions. For example:
Company A files a labor certification request on behalf of an alien ("Joe") as a janitor on January 10, 2003. The DOL issues the certification on March 20, 2003. Company A later files, and USCIS approves, a relating I-140 visa petition under the EB-3 category. On July 15, 2003, Joe files a second I-140 visa petition in his own behalf as a rocket scientist under the EB-1 category, which USCIS approves. Joe is entitled to use the January 10, 2003, priority date to apply for adjustment under either the EB-1 or the EB-3 classification.
UNQUOTE
Disclaimer -
I am not a lawyer and this is not a legal advise. You may want to talk a immigration attorney for exact interpretation
tattoo at 12 weeks. The fetus is
Sri_
09-26 01:11 PM
Just FYI, the online status of my cases show that the receipts were sent on 08/31 and I haven't received them till now. Its almost 26 days now.
Thanks
Thanks
more...
pictures At 12 weeks. The foetus
ingegarcia
05-24 03:17 PM
Done, sent from NH, keep your hard work IV.
dresses Fetus+at+12+weeks+pregnant
JazzByTheBay
09-20 07:25 PM
Citizenship comes 5 years later, if one's interested (and may not be everyone's goal).
Singing a country's national anthem is also different than taking the pledge of allegiance (the latter means you are pledging your loyalty to the United States):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
Having said that, excellent job Pankaj!! You had the crowds mesmerized!
jazz
Everyone here aspires to be a future citizen of the United States of America. If GC process didn't have problems, we would already have been citizens. Those who haven't learn't to sing it, should do so soon. It can be asked in the naturalization quiz.
Singing a country's national anthem is also different than taking the pledge of allegiance (the latter means you are pledging your loyalty to the United States):
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pledge_of_Allegiance
Having said that, excellent job Pankaj!! You had the crowds mesmerized!
jazz
Everyone here aspires to be a future citizen of the United States of America. If GC process didn't have problems, we would already have been citizens. Those who haven't learn't to sing it, should do so soon. It can be asked in the naturalization quiz.
more...
makeup measurement at 12 weeks 6
andy garcia
01-23 02:42 PM
Does she need her H4 approved to have her prospective employer file the I 129? (or) Can she just provide the notice of action she received for her H4 extension filing along with her I 129 to show that she is maintaining status?
Any one??
This is what the 129 instructions specify. I think that you will have to wait until the new I94 with the new dates is issued. Hopefully she will get it before April 1.
Change of Status.
In addition to the initial evidence for the classification you are requesting, a petition requesting a change of status for an alien in the United States must be submitted with a copy of the employee's(s) Form I-94, Nonimmigrant Arrival/Departure Record.
andy
Any one??
This is what the 129 instructions specify. I think that you will have to wait until the new I94 with the new dates is issued. Hopefully she will get it before April 1.
Change of Status.
In addition to the initial evidence for the classification you are requesting, a petition requesting a change of status for an alien in the United States must be submitted with a copy of the employee's(s) Form I-94, Nonimmigrant Arrival/Departure Record.
andy
girlfriend 12 weeks/10 weeks fetal age
thomachan72
03-02 03:03 PM
I have the non-availibility cert and a parent signed notarized affidavit with me but I am really thinking of submitting these to the registrar to try to get a real birth certifiate. The only reason I did not do it earlier was that somebody mentioned it takes a long time once you submit these to the registrat since it apparently has to go to the state capital or something like that. Anyway will try to get it during my next trip to India.
How about police varification records from India. Can we get that ahead of time or has it to be dated close to the date of 485 application? Since we only visit India for short periods isn't it ok to get that taken care of during our visits?
How about police varification records from India. Can we get that ahead of time or has it to be dated close to the date of 485 application? Since we only visit India for short periods isn't it ok to get that taken care of during our visits?
hairstyles fetus at 6 weeks. 10 to 12
indianindian2006
07-12 01:16 PM
http://boards.immigrationportal.com/showthread.php?t=257057&page=2
I have pasted this from the above site.
12th July 2007, 02:00 PM
sachatur
Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradkaram
I am just wondering any idea if how EB2 India PD 8/2005 got approved?
I was under the impression that the USCIS will only approve your GC if you PD was current? Am i missing anything here guys?
any comments by anybody..
sachatur nothing against you. dont misunderstand me.
No offense taken. I would be bemused too, if I didn't understand the process.
I don't think many people understand that visa allocations for documentarily-qualified applications are actually made at the time a bulletin is released.
And even otherwise, if they worked on July 1st, my PD WAS CURRENT on July 1st, and a visa may have been allotted on July 1st.
Again, I have interpreted a congressional briefing by Charles Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division, Visa services office of the DOS here:
http://www.immigrationportal.com/sho...72&postcount=3
__________________
EB2 India PERM PD 08/25/2005
I140/I485 TSC RD 09/29/2005
I140 AD 11/09/2005
FP1: 01/04/2006
FP2: 05/04/2007 (No update)
Update message received for address change on 10/04/2006
I485 AD 07/10/2007 (Only other update on 07/10/2007 19:26: Card Production Ordered)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I have pasted this from the above site.
12th July 2007, 02:00 PM
sachatur
Registered User Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by paradkaram
I am just wondering any idea if how EB2 India PD 8/2005 got approved?
I was under the impression that the USCIS will only approve your GC if you PD was current? Am i missing anything here guys?
any comments by anybody..
sachatur nothing against you. dont misunderstand me.
No offense taken. I would be bemused too, if I didn't understand the process.
I don't think many people understand that visa allocations for documentarily-qualified applications are actually made at the time a bulletin is released.
And even otherwise, if they worked on July 1st, my PD WAS CURRENT on July 1st, and a visa may have been allotted on July 1st.
Again, I have interpreted a congressional briefing by Charles Oppenheim, Chief, Immigrant Control and Reporting Division, Visa services office of the DOS here:
http://www.immigrationportal.com/sho...72&postcount=3
__________________
EB2 India PERM PD 08/25/2005
I140/I485 TSC RD 09/29/2005
I140 AD 11/09/2005
FP1: 01/04/2006
FP2: 05/04/2007 (No update)
Update message received for address change on 10/04/2006
I485 AD 07/10/2007 (Only other update on 07/10/2007 19:26: Card Production Ordered)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Soul
12-31 06:29 AM
:beam:
I'd say about 15 hours, not all together of course haha :P I like to take my time =)
Do ya like the sunset sky in the autumn one by the way? =)
Thanks for your votes guys :beam:
- Soul :goatee:
I'd say about 15 hours, not all together of course haha :P I like to take my time =)
Do ya like the sunset sky in the autumn one by the way? =)
Thanks for your votes guys :beam:
- Soul :goatee:
sjhugoose
February 4th, 2004, 08:09 PM
The failure of the D2H to be even remotely competitive with the 1D Mk 11 even though both cameras had similar development cycles is simply a embarrassment.
But Pope I thought 4 MP is all PJ's want ;)
But Pope I thought 4 MP is all PJ's want ;)
No comments:
Post a Comment