Monday, June 20, 2011

creating resume

images Creating a Killer Resume, creating resume. to Create a Great Resume
  • to Create a Great Resume



  • Munna Bhai
    12-18 03:22 PM
    Very good point. It's not worth the hassle to take a chance unless it's absolutely necessary.

    come on..once the rule is written it is written..so don't worry much neither press too much panic button. the receipt date is marked on I-485 and it is easy to prove it..so don't worry much..





    wallpaper to Create a Great Resume creating resume. When Creating Your Resume
  • When Creating Your Resume



  • glen
    04-08 10:16 PM
    This is like another feather in the hat....

    Great job by IV members...





    creating resume. tips| free resume samples | online resume | resume layout | making
  • tips| free resume samples | online resume | resume layout | making



  • amitps
    07-14 01:37 PM
    Me and my self live in Chicago. Adding ourselves...





    2011 When Creating Your Resume creating resume. In Emurse you can create,
  • In Emurse you can create,



  • i99
    09-10 03:49 PM
    Evidently from other threads some were sent to Texas, too.



    more...


    creating resume. looking resume? Create a
  • looking resume? Create a



  • snarla
    06-25 03:32 PM
    Yes i do plan to exit and enterthe country as soon as i get my renewed passport. I am worried that sometimes these passport renewals take so long that i may not get mine back in time for me to do so ...

    I am also in the process of finding out wheni can file for my extension ...





    creating resume. resume and form Curriculum
  • resume and form Curriculum



  • permfiling
    12-11 02:46 AM
    I missed the train too.. I guess we missed on purpose which is we make RICH in our own country in the future

    Business as Usual. They are minting (milking) money with other services.

    Damn H1, GC,#$%#$%$%$%^%$^

    All MNC's are flocking to INDIA lately. I think I am sitting on the wrong continent :-)


    Quotes on INDIA:

    a is the cradle of the human race, the birthplace of human speech, the mother of history, the grandmother of legend and the great grand mother of tradition.” - American Writer and Humorist Mark Twain

    “If there is one place on the face of earth where all dreams of living men have found a home from the very earliest days when man began the dream of existence, it is India.” - French scholar Romain Rolland

    “India conquered and dominated China culturally for 20 centuries without ever having to send a single soldier across her border.” - Hu Shih (Former Chinese ambassador to USA, referring to the entry of Buddhism into China. Buddhism was born in ancient India).

    So far as I am able to judge, nothing has been left undone, either by man or nature, to make India the most extraordinary country that the sun visits on his rounds. Nothing seems to have been forgotten, nothing overlooked.”- Mark Twain

    “In India I found a race of mortals living upon the Earth. but not adhering to it. Inhabiting cities, but not being fixed to them, possessing everything but possessed by nothing.”- Apollonius Tyanaeus, Greek Thinker and Traveller 1st Century AD

    “Bear in mind that the commerce of India is the commerce of the world and … he who can exclusively command it is the dictator of Europe.”- Peter the Great of Russia [LOOKS LIKE WE ARE GETTING THERE WITH IT]


    EB2- 10/05
    EB1 EA Appeal pending



    more...


    creating resume. Resume preview
  • Resume preview



  • pointlesswait
    01-23 10:19 AM
    am in too!
    we should have a meeting once in a while!! lets meet ASAP!!! and chart out a plan of action!





    2010 tips| free resume samples | online resume | resume layout | making creating resume. Creating a Killer Resume,
  • Creating a Killer Resume,



  • nc14
    04-30 03:34 PM
    To the point and very well written.

    http://www.skappy.com/index.php
    http://www.skappy.com/index.php?mode=viewmonth&month_no=06&year=2007



    more...


    creating resume. Creating.an.Online.Resume.
  • Creating.an.Online.Resume.



  • sk.aggarwal
    11-12 01:48 PM
    Thanks for sharing the link, I will go through this.

    It is not about money. I have absolutely no problem giving even 100$s per month for the cause if I know how my hard earned money is being spend. Actions like deleting threads, banning users just for asking reports, makes people uncomfortable. Have you seen the financial report at Eb3 Chinese Financial Report - ��›-�‰�-��Œ�š秿�-‘�•�-‹信�‰˜�Ÿ��‡‘ (http://www.eb3chinese.org/5.html).

    BTW, Hari if IV doesn't show you the links to donar forum, how will you know what you are missing ...
    just my 2 cents.





    hair In Emurse you can create, creating resume. Creating Resume for an acting
  • Creating Resume for an acting



  • senthil1
    01-23 07:15 PM
    Like this lot of bills will be introduced between Jan to Dec and nothing will happen.Any immigration bill pro or anti will have tough time to pass. Generally Anti immigration will not come under consideration. Pro-immigrant bills will be considered but it will be blocked or no agreement will be reached as usual. We have to see this year. President wanted CIR not because of Welfare of immigrants but for repairing the damage caused by Iraq Mess. The problem is
    Pro-immigrants are asking too much. Anti Immigrants are not willing to give anything. There is no one was trying to negotiate. Everyone wants scuttle the moves of others by politics. Instead if both anti immigrants and pro immigrants in the congress negotiate and form a compromise the bill can be passed easily. But the bill should be for the country not for one group of people.


    "Representative Elton Gallegly (R-CA) introduced H.R. 133, Citizenship Reform Act of 2007, which would limit citizenship by birth to children born to at least one permanent resident or citizen parent."


    Does this mean that if we do not have green cards our childern born here are not citizens. Am I understanding it right..



    more...


    creating resume. resume online create
  • resume online create



  • telekinesis
    05-16 04:19 PM
    Sounds good. I have work so it will have to be a medium time frame for me also.





    hot looking resume? Create a creating resume. making resume.
  • making resume.



  • gautamagg
    07-20 02:27 AM
    As some of you know that I don't really post on IV after the belittling of my posts and stand regarding F1 visas and support to Mr , I was asked by another IV loyalist friend who felt it was relevant I shared a letter I had sent to Mr. E Gonzalez over email yesterday as learnt of this issue yesterday.

    Dear Mr. Gonzalez

    I wanted to thank you for the announcement that has brought relief for many of us it is still the beginning of our fight for better processes and improved and updated laws for employment based green cards. I still don't see the light at the end of the tunnel with so many pending applications. I have already been 3 years in the process and my lawyers think I would be out for another 2 if not 3 after having gained premier advanced education from the US. The reasons are many fold. Some are process delays related and some due to statutory guidelines per the legislations. I wanted to document a few issues that if resolved can bring in a lot a relief. Also, I need to introduce you to an issue I was made aware of by a close friend who was surprisingly unhappy with yesterday's announcement.

    Process delays on the part of USCIS have caused many delays in employment based visas to be issued. And based on how annual caps are counted and met, many EB based visas have been lost. (~500,000 in the last few years per the Ombudsman's office i.e. almost 4 years worth of visas). This has created a chicken and an egg problem. Because of the USCIS delays, the visa numbers have cumulatively got lost and there is no way to recapture them without a legislation change. No one seems to address the former issue. The Congress does not really have anything planned for the recapture to happen. As a result the 4 year backlog will become 5 and 5 will become 6 and so on. Not only are skilled workers left frustrated with stagnant careers, they are also left unheard and asked to look at other greener pastures outside of the US. This is hurting the US economy in many ways but one. Employers such as Microsoft are unable to retain people and therefore opening offices offshore - this will only promote job off shoring that middle class America is most worried about. Action needs to be taken on the part of the USCIS and Congress; else this situation will have ripple effects for many years to come that may reshape the American Society - more in negative ways than positive.
    The next issue I wanted to discuss was something even crueler. Apparently people have been fighting for this issue from 1990 under many organizations with Unitefamilies.org being most active. Under the current legislation, a non immigrant long term visa holder such as F1, H1, L1, J1, etc. are allowed to immediately get their families (spouses and children) on similar dependent categories like F4, H4, etc. Also Green Card applicants can add the names of their spouses and children on their AOS applications (I-145) easily and create a primary-derivative pending application. But a Green Card holder who wishes to marry someone can not get his/ her spouse in the United States for over 6 years. The current legislation allows immediate family members such as spouse and children of citizens to be in the country in around 6 to 9 months but not so much for the permanent resident (PR). This leaves the PR holder with one of two options: live without family for 6 years or move with the family back to another country. The former is resulting in many broken families and against the American history that promotes family values. The latter is not feasible because PR laws require Green Card holders to be in the US for over 6 months a year to maintain the PR status. Is this really what our lawmakers want us to live with - 2 choices that change people's life for the worst?

    On further understanding of the issue, I realize that legislation change is needed to allow reuniting families. This needs to be sorted out, I want the lawmakers to consider people who became PRs through an H1 or L1 employment route be given the benefit of getting their families more easily since they had those benefits when on the Non-Immigrant Visa. Then why stop a permanent resident from being with his/ her family? The lawmakers may be concerned that allowing all Green card holders to do so will increase the misuse of this option and promote marriages of convenience; but the beneficiaries through employment category should be allowed because they could avail of it while in the pending state in any case. This needs a legislation change and may address a big chunk of the issue at hand.

    The one last scenario that I feel is a no brainier and needs no legislation change but more of a USCIS policy change is very straight forward and it becomes more relevant in this age of retrogression. This is the reason why my friend was unhappy and I have a feeling I may end up in this situation too and therefore will use myself as an example:

    Based on yesterday's announcement I apply for my AOS. As mentioned in earlier emails the benefits of the AOS pending let me come out a of a stagnant career path. I am single and 30 years old. Since I do not have a wife, my application has no derivative. 2 months down the line I find the love of my life and get married in 3-4 months - before my AOS has been approved. Now I want to have my wife get the benefit of the AOS as well such that I can get her the Green Card too - to avoid the 6 year waiting time she will have if I apply after I get approved. But by then the retrogression dates move back again and my PD is not current anymore. Per the current USCIS process one can not apply for AOS if the date is not current. That process is also extrapolated to derivative applicants where the primary is pending and therefore the derivative has to wait for the dates to get current. The problem with this issue is that because no one has visibility into how USCIS approves application the primary may get approved as soon as the dates become current before the derivative could apply for the AOS. The derivative will not be able to apply for AOS and will have to go back of the country and wait outside for 6 years to file using the other path. Even though the marriage took place before the primary got approved but a process guideline prevents the derivative to apply. This is a very cruel process for people who are about to get married but do not want to risk a broken family and are delaying filing their AOS even though the visa bulletin allows them to. God knows when this window will open again. My friend has to choose between filing his own AOS or marriage. A simple process update can help us fix this situation. While the USCIS and people are still debating allowing filing of 485s with retrogressed PDs, this is a side issue that is recommending allowing filing of 485 for derivatives ASAP (instead of waiting for the primary's PD to become current again) if the 485 of the primary is already pending to avoid long waiting years for a couple to be together.

    After hearing this issue, I am worried. My AOS was sent on Jul 2 and I am considering getting married by October. My PD is Dec 2004 EB2 India and may stay retrogressed for sometime. Per current process I will not be able to add my wife until my PD becomes current again and fear that my GC might get approved before I could do that...Ironically I am praying for a delay in my approval just so that I can build a family. This does not need a legislation change but a process review and change by the USCIS. This will help reduce the confusion on interfiled application and also reduce the strain on the 5-6 years of follow-on green cards.

    Please feel free to contact me to further understand this issue. Read the following complicated analysis attorney Murthy has laid out to explain this situation: http://www.murthy.com/news/n_retspo.html


    Thanks
    Gautam



    more...


    house Creating Your First Resume: creating resume. Creating an Effective Resume
  • Creating an Effective Resume



  • logiclife
    12-11 01:23 PM
    It makes no difference whether they allow concurrent filing of 140/485 or not IF YOUR EMPLOYER IS WILLING to pay extra premium processing for 140. IF not , it makes minimal difference (2-3 months delay). Earlier this year, people were getting 140 approved on 6-8 weeks on average without premium fee.

    If your date is not current:
    This rule makes 0 difference. File 140 and wait for approval while your date moves forward. Once its current, file 485. So everyone who is retrogressed, this rule makes no difference to you 485 filing and getting EAD/AP.

    If your date is current: File 140, regular processing 2-3 months and then file 485. If you can get premium processing done then it would be 15 days and then file 485. Either ways, you are delay in filing 485 by 2-3 months. In the grand scheme of things, its negligible. It would take even 2 months for your lawyer to get the paperwork straight for filing 485.

    So please relax, this new rule that does not allow concurrent filing of 485 and 140 is not earth-shattering. Its a revenue generation move. And its good as long as revenue stays in USCIS as they do need revenue to hire more people to process files faster, which is in our own benefit. The only problem we have is the rise in fees generates revenue which often times does not stay with USCIS and goes away to other agencies of DHS(I think, this was mentioned in CIS Ombudsman report, if I am not wrong).





    tattoo resume and form Curriculum creating resume. creating a new resume.
  • creating a new resume.



  • shreekhand
    05-12 11:12 AM
    Regarding point 1):

    Note that DoS has not wasted visa numbers after 2006. For all practical purposes, days of visa number wastage is history. Why do you think the July 2007 fiasco happened ?



    more...


    pictures Resume preview creating resume. to create your resume with
  • to create your resume with



  • walking_dude
    11-19 05:07 PM
    As per the current guidelines adjudicating officer makes the determination based on Department of Labor SOC/O*net code in the Labror Certification Application (ETA 9098) form. ( It's very critical to have a copy of LC application, before considering AC21. If you don't have it through employer, you can get a copy from DOL through FOIA request )

    DOLs SOC/O*Net gives the job description for the Job code as well as "same or similar" jobs (if you search on your SOC/O*net code)

    http://www.onetcodeconnector.org/

    Here's an example - http://www.onetcodeconnector.org/ccreport/15-1031.00

    This is the website IOs are supposed to be using (as per guidelines). Becoming a Sr. Software Engineer from Software Engineer shouldn't be an issue. Salary hike beyond 50% could (or could not) be a problem based on the IOs sole discretion. 50% is just a ball-park assumed by most immigration attorneys. In reality, there is no such preset limit. It's entirely upto the IOs decision.

    Promotion as manager is a tricky situation, as Job description changes. IO may consider it 'same or similar', or consider it altogether different. In such cases it may be possible to prove the jobs are similar by obtaining an 'Expert Opinion Letter' from an expert in the field ( such as a Professor of Computer Science from a University).


    How do Promotions impact one's existing GC application?

    for example: one filed for the GC as a Software Engineer, 5 years down the road one switches to a different company in the same area/location using EAD (avoiding AC21 for now) and the salary is 30 % higher than that was mentioned on one's LC filing and the job title is sr software engineer (same or similar responsibilities, senior title). How would something like this impact one's GC application?

    I also wonder what would happen to the GC application if one was to get another promotion and become a manager with even a higher salary (some job responsibilities stay the same and some new managerial responsibilites get added).

    I am sure many of us would have faced this since clearly many of us have been waiting for many many years - I would really appreciate your input on this. Thanks!





    dresses making resume. creating resume. creating Teachers+resume
  • creating Teachers+resume



  • admin
    04-08 09:05 PM
    Great work Alok in getting this endorsement from AAPI and Dr Koli. This goes to prove that we are getting more and more broad based support.

    IV has been endorsed by Dr Vijay N Koli, President of American Association of Physicians of Indian Origin! http://www.aapiusa.org/index.aspx



    AAPI, under the able leadership of Dr Koli and its Legislative Director, Anurag Varma, have been helping us behind the scenes. With acceptance of this Advisory Role Dr Koli has chosen to formalize this relationship.

    Dr Koli is an Internal Medicine physician who has been in practice for over 27 years in San Antonio, TX and who has ably led AAPI on some fresh initiatives. One of these involves AAPI formally providing expertise to the Indian Government in healthcare � this was formally acknowledged by the Prime Minister of India as one of the great initiatives at the latest Pravasi Bharatia Divas.

    Our cause is strengthened by Dr Koli and AAPI & their blessings!



    more...


    makeup Creating.an.Online.Resume. creating resume. Creating Your First Resume:
  • Creating Your First Resume:



  • gc_boy
    04-06 04:25 PM
    same story for me, i just moved to different unit in the same apartment. everything remains the same. Same city, same zip code, same employer.. Somehow i believe address change triggered the RFE. Probably the change in the file pushed my file in FIFO and someone looked into it and gave a RFE. Will have to wait till i get the actual letter.





    girlfriend creating a new resume. creating resume. Lynda.com Creating an
  • Lynda.com Creating an



  • andy garcia
    10-06 01:29 PM
    I personally need more defination of
    'Employment-based or Other: 110,786 '
    it is defining a narrow set of applicants. Are they ones whose 485 is stuck after filing 485. or are they ones whose 485 cannot be filed and only have 140 approved ?


    This means applicants that have already applied for I485 and have not been approved. It has nothing to do with the people who are waiting to apply.

    The whole thing is just a big PR scheme.





    hairstyles resume online create creating resume. Good Graphic Design Resume
  • Good Graphic Design Resume



  • vin13
    05-12 10:28 AM
    Below is data of PD from last four years for EB2-I - only for Jun, Jul & Aug.
    Except July Fiasco , I don't see dates ever moving forward in July VB; but they do move in August VB.
    Has anything changed in spillover laws in last 1 year - which will explain this no movement in July but in August?

    Jun 06 : 01JAN03 | July 06 : 01JAN03 | August 06 : U ---> No change in July. Aug backward
    Jun 07 : 01APR04 | July 07 : C | August 07 : U ---> July Fiasco
    Jun 08 : 01APR04 | July 08 : 01APR04 | August 08 : 01JUN06 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
    Jun 09 : 01JAN00 | July 09 : 01JAN00 | August 09 : 01OCT03 ---> No change in July. Aug forward
    Jun 10 : 01FEB05 | July 10 : ?????? | August 10 : ???? ---> Do your really expect forward movement in July?

    Good review of previous performance.

    What could be different this year compared to previous years are

    1) DOS seems to make sure no visas are wasted and so may not want to wait for the last 2 months of the fiscal year.

    2) More cases are pre-adjudicated which makes it easier for them to initiate the fall-across/fall-down in July than wait for August.

    3) DOS has been good at not retrogressing the the visa dates further back in the last few months. They either stay where they are or move forward. But not back. This indicates that they are paying more attention and not randomly opening up visas. This means they want to issue visas by priority dates which would need proper planning (to make sure nothing gets wasted)


    All these above factors may influence them to open up in July than August. Again, these are my gut feel.





    laksmi
    02-17 07:33 PM
    Yes you can include your spouse to 485 when dates are current and is not dependent on H1B transfer.





    ivuser
    02-19 01:15 PM
    Based on one of the core member's request, I did the research and shared the information with IV members, so that when you get the GC, you could make informed decision.
    Please be optimistic. You getting GC should not be a question of �if�, it should be a question of �when and how soon�.

    REQUEST ::
    Please support IV and make it happen soon.



    No comments:

    Post a Comment